Senior Software Engineer - Senior Software Engineer Randstad US Employee Review

2.0
Jun 16, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They have lot of clients.

Cons

1. They constantly lies to their employees about the rates. 2. Not a guaranteed job. I am currently on full-time with Randsatd so they take a huge cut out of my rate for the client; which comes with the job guarantee that they will not terminate employee even the contract with the client ends. I specifically asked this question before accepting the offer and they told me an employee will remain on bench with pay regardless of your project status. That is the main reason i accepted the job. I knew they are doing 60/40 rate. There are tons of consulting companies who does not provide job guarantee but do 80/20 rate. Randstad lied about the job guarantee. After working with Randstad for 3.5 years, I received the termination letter within 2 weeks of project end. It broke my heart because i lost so much money trusting them and not going with other consulting companies. Luckily they found the project and so they cancelled the termination letter. After 3 months i resigned because i was unhappy with the whole termination thing then their ill-mannered recruiter called me and started yelling saying they have done so much charity on me. How can i leave them, they gave me good rates even though they are not getting that much from client. Now i don't know if she is an idiot or she thinks i am an idiot that i will buy her story that Randstad was not making money from me. That's just common sense. I also knew my client rate because my client mistakenly sent me an email which contained that so i told her that. She started accusing me of lying and not knowing anything about business and being a complete fool. I worked with them almost 4 years and when client ended the project, they were about to terminate me but when i decide to move on, they started creating nuisance. My advice is to stay away from them. Join some other company who give you better rate or job satisfaction. 3. Most of their clients uses old technologies and are small companies with no process, vision or even good product architecture.

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Apr 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work environment, good culture

Cons

Would like more aggressive commission structure

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All