employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Ria Money Transfer

Part of Euronet

Engaged Employer

Poor culture and zero accountability - Anonymous employee Ria Money Transfer Employee Review

1.0
Apr 15, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent office downtown, flexible schedule. Challenging product and problems to work on. Opportunity to build something interesting and potentially great.

Cons

RIA struggles mightily with a culture of gossip and cliquish behavior. It's surprising how the rumors fly around there despite it being such a small office. To make matters worse the main offenders are protected by senior management and continue to alienate coworkers and stifle productive collaboration. Additionally, meetings too often end with people yelling at someone and storming out leaving the rest of the group to put the pieces back together. It's an often tense place to work with lots of whispering about what just happened. There is also a severe lack of accountability across the organization. There's too many people protecting their 5 hour work day. Most people lack the professionalism to dig in for 8 hours and own their project and responsibilities. They lack modern software delivery processes and fight any effort to implement them. Making most choices because it's the least amount of work and not taking a long-term and future view to the product. There's very little effort with senior management to make any real and lasting change to modernise process and hold people accountable for their responsibilities and behavior.

Explore other reviews about Ria Money Transfer

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to learn customer service! Great atmosphere Consistent schedule

Cons

Stress when cashing checks Working alone the majority of the time

1.0
Feb 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some people are great to work with

Cons

Compensation is significantly below market for product roles in fintech. You are expected to operate at a high strategic level while being paid closer to mid-tier startup salaries. Equity is used as a selling point, but stock performance has been consistently weak, making that upside questionable. Frequent restructuring makes long-term roadmap planning almost impossible. Entire teams can disappear after a quarter of strong performance if cost targets are not met. Senior talent is often removed under “cost alignment” language and replaced with lower-cost labor in other regions. Promotion criteria are vague. Results alone are not sufficient. Executive proximity and political alignment carry disproportionate weight.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All