High hopes for a great company, seriously disappointed - Marketing Assistant Scholastic Employee Review

2.0
Jan 7, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You can be a part of a company that gets inexpensive books into the hands of children, which will make you feel good at the end of the day. And that will keep you going when it gets tough. - The majority of employees are incredibly sweet, helpful, and welcoming. - Pay is decent for the industry

Cons

- Horribly managed. A public company, still led by the founder's son, who must approve every single hire. Ludicrous for a public company with thousands of employees. This obviously makes the hiring process tedious and barely worth it. They will offer you a temporary "temp" position to get you started quickly, promising you'll be permanent within 3 months. Multiply that by at least 4 and you have your real time line. - This company keeps so many employees at "temp" status just to avoid paying benefits for them. Its disgusting what they will do to loyal and reliable employees who have been temps for years and don't get rewarded for their service. - This company is living in the 80s and refuses to make any technological changes to keep up with the changing atmosphere in publishing, which can be incredibly frustrating. - Upper management is totally out of touch with the business and its needs, and will spend ridiculous amounts of money on first class flights, 5 star hotels, and massive re-prints, and then turn around and have a round of layoffs. This is not a lead-by-example company. - The bottom line is that everyone is overworked and incredibly under appreciated. Avoid this company if you can.

Explore other reviews about Scholastic

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

positive working environment, good people

Cons

great company to work for; no complaints

2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work and the clients are very nice to work with.

Cons

In my experience, the company's compensation practices lacked transparency and accountability. When employees asked questions about how their earnings, bonuses, or compensation were calculated, clear answers were often difficult to obtain. Decisions affecting employee pay were made without adequate explanation, and requests for clarification frequently went unresolved. What I found particularly concerning was the apparent disconnect between employee compensation outcomes and management compensation. Employees regularly experienced reduced bonuses or earnings, while management and executive leadership appeared largely unaffected by the same business decisions. This created the perception that the financial impact of those decisions was being borne primarily by employees rather than those making them. After repeatedly seeking explanations and receiving few meaningful answers, I lost confidence in the fairness and transparency of the compensation process.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All