An iconic publisher slowly losing its soul. - Territory Manager Scholastic Employee Review

3.0
Jan 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Autonomous work and great flexibility. Very little work during school holidays. It's great to get a sneak peek at the new kids books coming out. Company car for private use is a huge plus. Connecting kids with reading is an honourable mission. Book Club is a real win-win business where families have access to reasonably priced books delivered to the school and the school receives rewards. Scholastic Book Fairs are well received and loved by kids. Some sales training has been very useful making Scholastic a good stepping-stone company.

Cons

Comparatively low pay. Terribly outdated education resources that are difficult to sell when competitive product is superior. Upper management seem determined to spend as little as possible on education product while still expecting sales. Internal systems are clunky and inefficient. Accurate information can be hard to find and often contradictory. The torrent of licensed product does not appeal to booksellers or teachers as 'quality literature' and the heavy discounting for majors undermines Book Club and independent trade. While a majority of state managers and territory managers are easy to work with and positive, there are a couple of toxic individuals who victimise those they don't like. Autonomy is a two-edged sword - I saw a few colleagues go through the motions and stagnate in this role.

Explore other reviews about Scholastic

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

positive working environment, good people

Cons

great company to work for; no complaints

2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work and the clients are very nice to work with.

Cons

In my experience, the company's compensation practices lacked transparency and accountability. When employees asked questions about how their earnings, bonuses, or compensation were calculated, clear answers were often difficult to obtain. Decisions affecting employee pay were made without adequate explanation, and requests for clarification frequently went unresolved. What I found particularly concerning was the apparent disconnect between employee compensation outcomes and management compensation. Employees regularly experienced reduced bonuses or earnings, while management and executive leadership appeared largely unaffected by the same business decisions. This created the perception that the financial impact of those decisions was being borne primarily by employees rather than those making them. After repeatedly seeking explanations and receiving few meaningful answers, I lost confidence in the fairness and transparency of the compensation process.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All