Entropy at enterprise scale, but 10x it! - Anonymous employee SecurityScorecard Employee Review

1.0
Oct 22, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I've worked with some of the most genuinely kind, brilliant people of my career here, and I'd work with many of them in heartbeat elsewhere. (I was also blessed with a couple of amazing managers during my tenure here.) The initial salary was also fairly competitive, though the benefits are poor and somewhat expensive. The product/offering is solid in theory, and there are tailwinds to compensate for shortfalls in alignment within the organization and the corresponding execution.

Cons

Take note of Glassdoor's flag on manipulated reviews; from buying followers to inflating reviews, performative short cuts over substance abound. (On that Glassdoor rating, there was a while there where it sounded like the poor ratings were making it into the board meetings. The fix, rather than to adjust the things driving the poor ratings, was to fix the ratings themselves.) From 2022-2024, quarterly lay-offs were the norm. (For many of them, there was phrasing around many being "performance-based" if/when they were addressed, but each also had pockets of managers that did not know they were laying off their direct reports within the next 12 hours. And the music choices and vibes of the following town halls were definitely... something else.) While it's been a minute since there have been over/under bets on the tenure of SLT, that was a thing for a while there. 2025 to date has been marked by some wild attrition, whether folks had something lined up or not. Essentially, the turnover is real and constant, and it wasn't uncommon to see folks who had more than 3 managers in a year. Be prepared for the associated chaos. With that turnover, strategy and alignment across the organization (as well as execution) suffered. Repeatedly. (And will probably continue to do.) In many teams, you will be under-resourced for the goals set. Further complicating/compounding that problem are pet projects and priorities that are going to come in from on high that likely won't be driving any meaningful progress towards any of your or the company's goals. (You will occasionally be handed the same pet project as a handful of other people, and if you don't know to ask, you're all about to waste a few hours in your silos.) Along with those pet projects, you'll also be asked to embrace leadership's latest philosophies — some of these things will be useful, some will be distractions, but there's a certain amount of expectation around the lot. (Performance and image are a recurring theme in many of the reviews from folks who've made it past a year — I'd suggest you weigh those more than reviews from folks with their rose-tinted glasses.) Despite the turnover and verbiage around performance, there are absolutely still pockets of people who claim credit and receive the compensation for work other employees and/or teams are doing or finding workarounds for. (If you're the person who clings to silver linings, you can take that as an opportunity to learn how to own adjacencies or even entire projects from end-to-end. You'll also typically find plenty of folks to commiserate with because if those people you work around are C-Suite favorites, no amount of manager documentation around the lack of output is actually enough to get them fired.) Unlimited PTO is a thing, and Wellness Days have made a reappearance, but neither actually put a moratorium on being contacted about work on a holiday, a weekend, and/or while you're off. (To be fair, the expectation to be responsive and provide a timeline is *usually* stronger than the expectation to actually execute during those moments.) — The prevailing philosophy over the past year or so has been to just not pay vendors unless absolutely necessary; it got to the point where it was definitely impacting the brand and other vendors' willingness to work with us. (I don't think the marketing/sales teams had fielding unpaid vendors at tradeshow booths on their bingo card, but here we are.) On the one hand, being sent to collections, on the other hand, talks of M&A. On the note of financials, do not expect raises or title bumps; those are the exception, not the rule, even if you're consistently hitting it out of the park. (If you're coming in, make sure you negotiate well on the front-end because many folks who've been there for years have not received either.) — Resilience may be a core value in theory, but in practice, survival is the more accurate portrayal of it. You will not be alone in developing poorer physical and mental health outcomes as a result of working at SSC. Although if I had a dollar for every time someone said or wrote "10x it", I could have funded a sabbatical.

Explore other reviews about SecurityScorecard

5.0
May 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Opportunity to interact with major companies and learn cybersecurity solutions. Sales training is helpful.

Cons

Sales targets can be demanding during some quarters.

avatar
SecurityScorecard Response
2w
It is fantastic to hear that you are enjoying our enterprise client exposure and sales training. We know sales targets can feel demanding during peak quarters. To support you, our leadership team reviews these targets regularly, and we recently brought on a new Senior Director of Total Rewards to ensure our compensation remains fair and competitive. We are also continuously rolling out new enablement sessions and tools to help you succeed. Thank you for your hard work!
2.0
Jun 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

SecurityScorecard has smart, hardworking people, and there are real opportunities to take on meaningful work quickly. If you are someone who can operate independently, solve ambiguous problems, and move fast, you can have a lot of impact here. There are also pockets of strong cross-functional collaboration, especially among employees who are genuinely trying to keep the business moving despite constant change.

Cons

The biggest issue is leadership instability and inconsistent operating discipline. Priorities change quickly, ownership is often unclear, and too much critical work depends on a small number of people rather than durable processes or properly staffed teams. There is a pattern of asking employees to absorb more scope without the resources, authority, or support required to execute sustainably. Decision-making can feel reactive instead of strategic. Different teams may push overlapping initiatives without clear alignment, which creates confusion, duplicated work, and unnecessary political friction. There is also a tendency to reward urgency over planning, which leads to burnout and makes it difficult to build systems that last. Communication from leadership often feels disconnected from the reality of day-to-day execution. The company talks about transformation and innovation, but the internal operating model does not always support that ambition.

6
avatar
SecurityScorecard Response
2w
Thank you for this detailed feedback. We are grateful you highlighted our team's talent and the opportunities for meaningful impact. We are listening closely to your concerns regarding operational discipline, as we want to avoid a hero culture in favor of sustainable success. As we grow into a more mature organization, management is focused on streamlining operations and building structured processes. We are planning for our future and increasing cross-functional alignment to support everyone.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All