Thanks for the memories! (they were not so great) - Patient Care Coordinator Sensible Care Employee Review

1.0
Feb 20, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, employer sponsored equipment (laptop and monitor), insurance was pretty good, great coworkers, great company culture for a remote environment, manageable workload, pretty good work/life balance.

Cons

Toxic positivity. Micromanagement. Management was not available whatsoever and unceremoniously privated their calendars one day so we were no longer able to see what they actually did all day (hint: they did nothing, or they'd have 3 hour long meetings to chit chat). No growth opportunities. Constant reminders that raises were "not in the budget this year," meanwhile executives would choose favorites and promote them from within without interviewing, and multiple C-suite executives were hired with no monetary issue! (then abruptly let go at the end of their 90 days). The PCC department became toxic incredibly quickly, and management bought into the toxicity. No one at this company exercised professional boundaries, especially not management with PCCs. Ridiculously high turnover rate. A delusional CEO with leadership that enables him. I can't say with certainty that this place has any sort of legal counsel, which is deeply concerning. They truly only care about money. Their excuses of putting patients first and whatever other BS they fed us were so thinly veiled, even patients were reaching out saying this place only cared about money. Since I left the company, I can name multiple employees who have reached out to me just to complain about this place. Point blank: Sensible Care is a sinking ship. I am grateful every single day that I left.

Explore other reviews about Sensible Care

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility in a remote & independent environment

Cons

You must be a self-starter, not a con for me.

2.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The role provided valuable experience working with diverse clients in a fast-paced telehealth environment. It was a good opportunity to strengthen clinical skills, crisis assessment, documentation, and treatment planning. Some coworkers were supportive and collaborative, and the remote structure offered flexibility and convenience.

Cons

The productivity expectations were difficult to sustain long term, especially while balancing documentation, administrative responsibilities, and quality client care. Clinicians were required to use two separate EHR systems, which made workflows inefficient and time-consuming. One of the systems felt outdated and impractical, adding unnecessary stress and administrative burden to the workday. The onboarding and training process also felt rushed and insufficient for the complexity of the role. Much of the onboarding work was expected to be completed prior to the official start date and compensated at a significantly lower hourly rate. Beyond the initial training day and a brief follow-up the following week, there was limited structured support before clinicians were expected to begin seeing clients immediately. Appointments started on day one, leaving little time to become comfortable with the EHR systems, workflows, documentation expectations, and overall processes. There was also an expectation to maintain a high caseload as a “cushion” to account for cancellations, no-shows, and productivity requirements. This often resulted in overloaded schedules and made it difficult to maintain a sustainable work-life balance while still providing quality care and completing documentation thoroughly. Schedules could also become fragmented throughout the day, contributing to burnout. Communication and support from management were inconsistent, and there was significant pressure surrounding metrics and billable hours. Overall, the workload often felt heavier than what could realistically be completed during scheduled hours.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All