Very good company, bad team - Technical Support Engineer Splunk Employee Review

4.0
May 27, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very nice office - Good Benefits - Booming company - Very good market share

Cons

- Support entity not fully mature

avatar
Splunk Response
7y
Sorry to hear that you don't have the most supportive team. We know that this can impact your experience of working for such a great company. Make sure to engage with HR and the results of Speak Up, Splunk! (our culture survey) to start the process of improving the experience. Feel free to let us know how things are going at openconversation@splunk.com. - Peter Vogt, Employee Communications

Explore other reviews about Splunk

5.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Excellent work life balance and competitive compensation. - Strong benefits and talented, supportive colleagues. - Industry leading technology with an established brand. - Opportunity to work with large enterprise customers and travel when needed.

Cons

- Since the Cisco acquisition, leadership quality and sales execution have noticeably declined. The culture has shifted from customer success to excessive focus on spreadsheets, dashboards, and internal metrics. - Internal politics and favoritism have become increasingly apparent, creating inconsistent opportunities across territories and reps. - The Splunk / Cisco integration remains fragmented. Sales motions, product positioning, and incentives are not aligned, making it difficult to execute effectively. - Cisco sellers are still not consistently incentivized to sell Splunk, creating unnecessary friction between teams. - Lack of experienced SE resources makes running successful PoCs difficult and slows sales cycles. - Account Executives are increasingly treated like overlays rather than owners of their business. - Product innovation has slowed, with a greater emphasis on packaging and licensing changes instead of meaningful platform improvements, while competitors like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks continue to execute aggressively.

1
2.0
Feb 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employment Healthcare Dental and vision 401(k) match Employee Stock Purchase Program

Cons

I was an employee of Splunk prior to its acquisition by Cisco. To say the two organizations run things completely different is to say it mildly. Micromanagement, passive aggressiveness, poor communication are just a few of the things that I still remember post acquisition. The level of micromanagement is counter productive and yields far less results than trying to imbed a sense of true ownership. Prior to acquisition Splunkers for the most part were valued as individuals. Post, it is more do it or else mentality. From interactions and observations, direct line managers are heavily stressed causing the ripple effect. Favorites or favoritism are in more abundance post acquisition resulting in increasing 90/10 rule. Promotions are more cutthroat post acquisition as Cisco actually thinks Splunkers coming over were paid too much. So they shuffled folks around, froze headcount that created more work for those still there, and reduced the promotion slots. SEs started jumping off the burning ship so I followed suit and am thankful I did. More and more it seemed like the Splunk folks were just surviving rather than thriving. I was honestly a bit sad when I left because I had so much fun working with Splunk prior to the acquisition. It was energetic, vibrant, and employees had loyalty to the brand. The work was challenging in a good way and people’s individual strengths were leveraged as opposed to having one cookie cutter mold for all.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All