Exciting High Growth Startup in a Meaningful industry - Anonymous employee Spring Health Employee Review

5.0
Aug 11, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Mission - finding proper mental health care can be extremely difficult and cause its own mental health burdens. When the product is at its best, it's literally changing lives for the better. The onboarding process is pretty thorough and quickly introduces you to all the departments at Spring. The people I've worked with are great. They care about the mission, put effort and care into their work and strive to collaborate with one another. Leadership is encouraging (almost sometimes too much) and frankly, pretty transparent for a company at this stage. There are All-Hands and CEO AMA's every month where questions are taken and answered in front of the whole company. Culture of Acknowledging problems and working to fix them - Like any high growth startup, processes and systems that we're adequate 12 months ago are no longer able to keep up with the business. However, these issues are called out, often with a plan to fix them. I've worked at many places were doing so would be discouraged or a fix would be put off until the system breaks.

Cons

Explosive growth can put a significant strain on employees, systems, and processes alike. We need to excelerate hiring to ensure teams are properly staffed and match the growth of the business. We need to establish scaled processes now to ensure the growth doesn't break the company.

Explore other reviews about Spring Health

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I received payment on time.

Cons

No cons. Just moved on.

3.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company's products help people in meaningful ways

Cons

Company is very poorly misled. There isn't a real vision or culture. In general, ways of working here are scattered and immature. We have a new SDLC every 10 months or so. Constant re-orgs and changes in leadership cause instability. Teams and ICs are re-allocated every 3–6 months. Priorities are constantly shifting. "Science will win" except when it comes to evaluating AI's place in our product. Sudden AI focus despite not having a real vision for how it aligns with our mission. Leaders who report directly to the CEO often cycle out every year or so. There seems to be very little awareness or ownership that leaders aren't set up for success. The company says it cares about employee "thriving" but promotes leaders with very poor scores. It seems to be more of a vanity metric/tool to fire people.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All