Staffmark - Houston, we have a problem! - Branch Employee Staffmark Employee Review

1.0
Jan 27, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Training in various areas is complete and provided often for employees within the Staffmark offices. The trainers are quite experienced and will gladly provide additional assistance when requested. Technological improvements have helped streamline operations to help lighten the load of recruiters and operations personnel. Clients love the Staffmark firm do to our ability to satisfy their personnel requests.

Cons

- Very little pay for the managers and recruiters. - Staffmark does not provide enough staff per office. Employees feel overwhelmed and underappreciated - Expectations are extremely high with little reward. For example, you can bring in multiple new accounts and revenue as a recruiter and fill temp to perm requisitions, but are NEVER be compensated for these efforts. The commission structure is not as competitive with other agencies. - Incentives are laughable. If you win a contest, mere $5 gift cards serve as a reward. -Morale is low because everyone is so overworked. Upper management does not care about work/life balance. When away from the office, (vacation, medical leave, sick day, me time) you will receive calls from management that can wait upon return to the office. -Some individuals within upper management make poor decisions, but are quick to shift blame to others when that poor decision affects revenue growth and/or operations. - Ethics are questionable -Company is slow to promote minorities.

Explore other reviews about Staffmark

5.0
Jul 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Consistent work and very professional. Staffmark cares for their employees.

Cons

None that come to mind.

3.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are strong individual contributors across the organization who genuinely care about their clients and candidates. The business itself has market opportunity, especially in industrial staffing, and there is potential to build something meaningful with the right strategy and execution.

Cons

Leadership lacks alignment between stated goals and actual execution. There is a clear disconnect between the vision communicated during hiring and the day-to-day expectations in role. In some instances, employees are placed in situations where they are asked to engage in practices that raise ethical and, at times, legal concerns. This creates an uncomfortable and high-risk working environment, particularly for those who prioritize compliance and professional integrity. Despite discussions around evolving the business toward higher-margin, relationship-driven growth, the operating model continues to default back to transactional “fill and bill” activity. Efforts to introduce more strategic structure, improve efficiency, and modernize workflows are often dismissed or labeled as unnecessary. There is also inconsistency in how policies and code of conduct are applied, which creates a perception of unfair and selective enforcement. This impacts trust, morale, and overall team performance. Additionally, there is an over-reliance on outdated sales approaches that do not reflect how modern workforce solutions are built or sustained in today’s market.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All