Real fiasco - Anonymous employee Symbotic Employee Review

1.0
Oct 30, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good salary and Interesting projects Good teamwork Flexible hours

Cons

CEO and VP are worthless. Finally Chris Gahagan is gone Multiple bad decisions Montreal used to have over 400 employees. Massive layouts.

avatar
Symbotic Response
7y
Thank you for the feedback. Previously, Symbotic was exceedingly focused on scaling. More recently, the focus of the company has shifted to delivering for current customers through consistent and reliable performance. This is partly aligned with the CEO transition you mention. This shift has required us to realign our resources and rethink our priorities to take us to the next stage . We are learning as we go and doing our best to improve for our customers—and each other. If you’re comfortable, I encourage you to bring up any specific suggestions you have with your manager or reach out to anyone on the leadership team directly.

Explore other reviews about Symbotic

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Cutting-edge A.I.-powered robotics — you work on technology that's actually transforming the supply chain • Brilliant colleagues across engineering, robotics, controls, and software • Real ownership from day one — step up and you'll be recognized • Direct customer impact — your work runs in live operations for the world's largest retailers • Fast growth means real career opportunities

Cons

• Pace is intense — tight deadlines and demanding periods come with the territory • Steep learning curve early on due to system complexity • Processes are still maturing as the company scales rapidly

2.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting technology and exposure to advanced automation systems. Opportunity to work on complex engineering projects.

Cons

Poor work-life balance with high expectations and little flexibility. Communication from leadership and the general manager was very limited, making it difficult to stay aligned. There was also a lack of transparency around performance expectations and job security. Even when performing well and fully understanding the environment and workflows, employees could be let go without warning or a second chance. This creates unnecessary turnover and results in lost knowledge, requiring time and resources to retrain new engineers who are unfamiliar with the systems.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All