Compensation is terrible for anyone working on trading application - IT Manager TD Employee Review

2.0
Nov 7, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Because the compensation is way too low when compare to the market average, management could only hire people who has no/little experience on the subject and ask them to learn. It provides a great learning environment if the individual is a self learner and will become a valuable asset for other banks.

Cons

Compensation is terrible for people working directly on trading application. Work is highly stressful and challenging as the technology solution team will support front office operation, but getting back office salary pay. Very high turnover on the trading application team and seems like senior management or HR does not want to do anything to it. Spent a lot of money to hire external consultant to do something that should really be done internal. This is because external consultant has a steep learning curve of understanding the infrastructure system in the trading application side. A lot of those millions that pay to the external consultant could really be done by a few full time employee in a few months (cost in unit of 100 thousands) if we could retain qualified employee by paying them the market average salary.

Explore other reviews about TD

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

TD Bank offers Great benefits, very diverse work environment, everyone is super nice, and willing to help if help is needed. The pay is great!

Cons

TD Bank is very big on time management. Very strict on the 31 minute lunch break, no more no less exactly 31 minutes!

1.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Wish there was some to share.

Cons

Working in Talent Acquisition here was one of the most frustrating experiences of my career. The culture felt incredibly toxic, with management frequently creating an environment where employees’ concerns were dismissed or reframed in a way that made them question their own experiences. Communication lacked transparency, expectations changed constantly, and support from leadership was minimal. Hiring decisions often felt inconsistent, with factors outside of merit seemingly carrying more weight than skills and qualifications. As someone in TA, that made it difficult to feel confident in the integrity of the recruitment process. Management created a culture of fear rather than collaboration. Feedback was rarely constructive, accountability was one-sided, and employee well-being did not appear to be a priority. Morale was consistently low, turnover was high, and it was difficult to see a path for growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All