employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Alan Turing Institute

Engaged Employer

Steer clear - Anonymous Employee The Alan Turing Institute Employee Review

1.0
Feb 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Non research salaries are quite good (researchers underpaid) Flexibility (although has drawbacks including people hiding at home doing nothing…) Office space is quite good and was improving Some great colleagues

Cons

Poor processes and procedures. Lots of forms and needless, unhelpful bureaucracy, but also a lack of proper oversight and governance where it was actually needed. Terribly wasteful. Odd relationships with stakeholders including government. It seemed like quite a bad place for junior researchers. Terrible senior leadership as many others have mentioned. They are all incompetent and should not have the level of responsibility they do. I found one to be a bit of a bully. I left whilst the reorganisation to ‘Turing 2.0’ (no, me neither) was still ongoing (after over two years of chaos which had achieved nothing). Many other people left who had also tried to hold out, but could not see an end to the madness. Whist there were some really great people left, I do feel that a lot of those who stayed - especially in more senior roles, including directors and senior managers, not just ELT - did so because they didn’t really care about it getting better (and were just happy to take the salary), or they enjoyed the drama and didn’t care that their careers had stagnated, or (most likely) they could not find another job that would pay them that much to sit at home achieving very little. So I only see it getting worse, unfortunately.

Explore other reviews about The Alan Turing Institute

5.0
May 25, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Top notch projects of national importance, great group of people.

Cons

Location should be changed. They should build their own campus.

1.0
Mar 28, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free drink in the office Talented staff

Cons

Lack of clear vision and strategic direction from leadership, they have a very limited understanding of how teams actually operate day-to-day. The transformation and new structure were implemented without meaningful consultation with team leads, particularly around operational needs and how work is delivered in practice. This has resulted in decisions that disconnected from reality and have not addressed the core challenges teams face. While the intention has been to reduce silos, the outcome has been the opposite. Teams are now operating in more isolated ways than before, with less clarity on responsibilities and collaboration across functions. There has been a lack of care and consideration for staff throughout this transformation process. Redundancies have impacted individuals regardless of tenure, including those who were only recently recruited. For those remaining, workloads have increased significantly beyond their original scope, in order to cover gaps left by redundancies. It is also difficult to reconcile the organisation’s stated commitment to EDI with decisions such as making the EDI team redundant. Although the transformation has been described as complete, there is little evidence of tangible improvement. In many areas, processes and ways of working appear to have deteriorated rather than improved. Millions has been made into the ERP system, yet they do not appear to meet basic operational needs. Its ironic to see this at the national AI and data science research institute. The work culture feels more distant and less transparent. There is limited visibility into how decisions are made, and communication lacks clarity and consistency. This has contributed to a sense of disconnect between leadership and staff, and has impacted overall trust and engagement.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All