employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Nature Conservancy

Engaged Employer

Wonderful place to work! - Human Resources Generalist The Nature Conservancy Employee Review

5.0
Apr 29, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

TNC's benefits are wonderful. You can tell the organization cares about its people from the generous benefits provided. The organization is a learning organization, which allows TNC to be flexible and also grow positively. TNC also supports employee growth and development, which has been a great change from previous employers. Leadership is always willing to listen to employees. The compensation strategy of the organization is fair and equitable. Working in the U.S., the typical hours here are 35 hours (note: some positions require more or less hours). The collaborative nature of TNC allows employees to work with and learn from colleagues around the world, as well as people from the communities that we work in. This enables TNC to make a difference with a deeper understanding of how people and nature thrive. I appreciate the DEIJ focus that TNC now has.

Cons

With such a large and matrixed global organization, it can be difficult to have a one-size fits all approach to certain things like SOPs or policies. Because the work that we do is so important, it can be difficult sometimes to not be worried about our impact outside of work. This can cause burnout. Having the additional personal leave days has been wonderful, but only if employees are willing to utilize them. This is the same for the flexible work arrangements.

Explore other reviews about The Nature Conservancy

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rewarding work, amazing people, beautiful sights, lots of free food

Cons

Long hard days, sweaty, tough if you have a family.

2.0
Jul 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and access to programs, resources, and employee support that are often more comprehensive than what is available at smaller nonprofits.

Cons

There is a culture of sweeping problems under the rug to manage perceptions and avoid accountability. Many employees recognize that raising concerns about structural issues is unlikely to lead to meaningful change, which discourages people from speaking up. Managers and directors have incentives to protect their own interests rather than escalate serious problems, particularly when those issues reflect on their own leadership. In turn, senior leaders may be reluctant to address those management failures because they were responsible for hiring or promoting those managers in the first place. This creates a cycle where accountability is consistently avoided, allowing organizational dysfunction to persist. Recent restructuring decisions are a good example of these broader issues. During the North American marketing reorganization, some less qualified directors and managers were placed directly into their roles, while others were required to interview for essentially equivalent positions. Criteria such as geographic constraints were applied inconsistently across comparable roles, leaving employees with the impression that the process was neither transparent nor equitable. The resulting uncertainty and perceived unfairness have contributed to low morale, resentment, and reduced trust in leadership. Because they specialize in communications, marketing team members are especially skilled at framing or explaining away problems in ways that minimize their visibility to senior leadership, including the CMO. As a result, underlying issues often remain unaddressed until they become much larger problems.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All