employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

Some stay for a few years, and some never leave - Multiplatform Editor The Washington Post Employee Review

5.0
Feb 8, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many people spend a decade or more here and find it fulfilling. Pay is not the highest in the industry but it’s certainly near the top. (New hires fresh out of college seem to start above $65,000.) If you’re passionate about what you do, love teamwork and collaboration, and want multiple opportunities to try something new, then stop yearning for a New York Times job and get yourself here. You don’t need to be a reporter to be valued here. Several managing editors weren’t. Mark is social media guru, and Kat is a design and product goddess, for example.

Cons

Before Sally Buzbee came in, the paper was sued — and is still being sued — by a reporter over top editors’ handling of her past sexual assault. Previously, the paper was run mostly by men, including by Marty Baron, who ironically prized the “institution” over “personalities,” which he saw as an affront to modern journalism’s obsession with balanced reporting. Now it’s run by several women, including Sally, who just gets it, if you know what I mean, and many managing editors didn’t rise up the journalism food chain as reporters, the prototypical way of ascending legacy media. Washington housing is expensive for everyone. So are on-site and nearby lunch options. Reporters are gods, but everyone else, especially if you work on the intersection of journalism and product, can hold their own too.

Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

5.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

Cons

Nothing bad to say at all tbh

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented coworkers who care strongly about the mission of supporting independent journalism.

Cons

Context: tech side of the org - C-suite will pay lip service to disruptive innovation and allowing ideas to come from anywhere, but at the end of the day you will realize they always had a pet project in mind and nothing else actually mattered. Furthermore, those ideas will have you saying "...that's what we came up with?" - C-suite & other leadership (in my professional opinion) regularly cherry-pick and misinterpret data, intentionally or not, oftentimes to support the narrative they want. - C-suite can't handle negative feedback or opposing ideas, and has actively chastised employees for speaking up. I have never felt so unsafe using my voice and challenging power, which is ironic at a newspaper. - It's famously difficult to get promoted here. Your career will progress more slowly than you ever thought was possible. - There is so much potential for growth and innovation, but if you stay for long enough you'll realize it's not possible due to the rot and misaligned incentives at the top of the organization.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All