employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Is this your company?

Rewarding Mission, Lots of Flexibility, Difficult to Get Recognized - Grants Officer US Fish and Wildlife Service Employee Review

4.0
Sep 11, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I love that I get to use my skill set (administrivia, attention to details, getting in the weeds on policy, financial analysis, regulatory compliance) to save the animals, as corny as that sounds. Many working for the US Fish and Wildlife Service are scientists: biologists, geologists, ecologists, social scientists, etc., yet almost a third serve in support roles, including budget and finance, contracting, grants, IT, HR, etc. Don't let a lack of technical background stop you from applying. In addition, I was able to go 100% remote after COVID. Many others are remote or at least hybrid with the option to work from home up to 50% of the time. When times are tough budget-speaking, USFWS does a really good job of ensuring there are "enough chairs on the deck," meaning there are slots for employees to be moved to should a program be shut down without letting staff go. Its nationwide presence means there are literally hundreds of offices to coordinate with for partnerships, events, and detail opportunities.

Cons

Government work is notorious for not recognizing top performers and not being able to negotiate compensation or benefits. A perfect score in an annual performance review can get you a modest bonus (~1 paycheck) or up to a week of leave, yet a colleague who does a fraction of what you do can end up with something very, very similar. Most technical jobs cap out at the GS-12/13 level, so if you want to earn more than that, you have to go into management. Working for the government can mean a lot of pivoting when the administration changes and undoing much of what you spent the last 4 years doing.

Explore other reviews about US Fish and Wildlife Service

5.0
Nov 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Admirable agency mission; many employees truly care about the resources, animals, ecosystems, etc. Good professional growth opportunities.

Cons

National wildlife refuge managers have too much unilateral power; there aren't enough checks and balances heading up the chain--and there's some lingering good 'ol boy-ism--so one bad manager can reverse years of community and conservation work and throw an entire refuge down the tubes.

3.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great if you're invested in the mission to conserve and restore ecosystems and wildlife populations; good benefits and work-life balance

Cons

Congressional meddling and changing priorities for initiatives at the regional level makes it extremely difficult to actually move the needle for species recovery. Now, with staff and budget cuts and changes in policies under the current administration, USFWS and the ESA are being de-fanged, defunded and deregulated to the benefit of private corporations and extractive industries (coal, oil & gas, mining). Internal morale has plummeted since Feb 2025.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All