Fair, Balanced, with Room for Improvement - Senior Staff Representative United Airlines Employee Review

3.0
Aug 10, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Innovative work in the marketing/e-commerce department. Good opportunity to gain exposure to interactive marketing projects focused on B2C product delivery, driving revenue via conversion of consumer transactions, and brainstorming and implementing creative strategies to significantly impact the customer experience and satisfaction (when not constrained by administrative budget issues).

Cons

The company has been impacted by too many volatile industry variables, such as fuel costs, and has a recent trending towards frequent labor shifts (i.e., layoffs/furloughs, bankruptcy, salary paycuts, reduction-in-force/cost saving initiatives, etc.). Additionally, the travel industry is very fossilized, which results in a reliance on traditional business practices and methodologies, many of which are impractical in a constantly evolving industry-specific sector. Professional growth and career advancement can become stagnant and/or be omitted as a result of frequent cost-cutting and labor dislocation.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flying benefits Great community of people Very diversed Cares about it’s people

Cons

Nothing that I can think of

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All