Captain - Pilot United Airlines Employee Review

4.0
Mar 6, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A career as a flight officer for United is about as good as it gets. Good pay and time off, and work with a great group of Pilots. The industry itself appears to be in a constant state of turmoil, and issues from that sometimes tend to roll downhill, but if your a pilot looking for a job with a major United has a bright future.

Cons

No doubt that United still has growing pains from the merger. Back office operations, operational snags, and under investment in IT and staffing have all taken its toll on the new larger combined airline. Employee morale is less than optimum due to the shoestring support of a milk toast middle management layer. These problems will be resolved, the expected retirement rate high, and movement will be quick.

avatar
United Airlines Response
10y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. From the top down, we are constantly striving to earn the trust of our employees and customers. We certainly still have our struggles from the merger. Every day we are striving to move past the merger and make United a great place to work. As you said we absolutely have a "bright future" ahead. – KC

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good pay , good hours, good co workers

Cons

stop the favortism and be fair in schedule

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All