I would recommend them to others, but I would not personally return. - Project Manager UnityPoint Health Employee Review

3.0
Nov 24, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Initially, the environment was excellent and there are so many great people there. Compensation was fair-good, benefits were acceptable. There exists a possibility for this organization to reach great heights and I sincerely hope they are able to continue cultivating a culture where the employees can feel proud to call themselves a part of UPH.

Cons

Ironically, medical insurance is somewhat costly. Departmental management and Directors are fairly cliquey and tend to run in a pack, rather than working with and trusting their staff. Executive Leadership is quite removed from Director level and below. The financial impact of Covid-19 and subsequent need for layoffs was entirely understandable. However, the manner in which they handled those layoffs was slimy and created terrible situations for so many loyal employees.

Explore other reviews about UnityPoint Health

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, support from management

Cons

Pay, peers can be challenging at times

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My team is the best!

Cons

They put directors in charge of functions they don’t actually understand, then surround themselves with people who tell them what they want to hear instead of what the organization needs to hear. The result is predictable: poor decisions, endless bureaucracy, and little accountability. They constantly talk about financial pressures while outsourcing work under the guise of “strategic partnerships” when it’s really about cutting costs. Cost reduction isn’t a strategy if you’re sacrificing capability, institutional knowledge, and long-term performance. My biggest concern is that they’ll continue making the same mistakes across other business functions before realizing the damage they’ve done. The organization has an extraordinary amount of tenure, but that’s not always a strength. Too often, poor performance is tolerated instead of addressed. Keeping low performers indefinitely while failing to invest in and reward high-performing talent creates unnecessary overhead and mediocrity. If they built teams around excellence instead of longevity, they’d likely achieve better results with fewer resources. Unless you’re looking for a corporate environment where there is zero accountability, conversations go in circles and leadership is more focused on protecting its own agenda than making difficult decisions, I wouldn’t recommend spending your time here.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All