Great place for learning and growth as a data scientist - Data Scientist Verisk Employee Review

5.0
Mar 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits package - Interesting and impactful projects - Strong learning and development opportunities - Good work-life balance and flexibility - Supportive environment, great culture

Cons

- Hybrid work, remote only in special cases

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Greetings! Thank you for sharing your insights. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our benefits package, growth opportunities, and commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. At Verisk, we hold a deep belief in the power of bringing your whole self to work — allowing you to flourish in an open, inclusive environment. Your acknowledgment of our culture is truly encouraging. Should you have any further feedback or suggestions on how we can continue to improve, please reach out to HR.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All