Nice place to work - Field Representative Verisk Employee Review

5.0
Mar 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Independent/flexible scheduling Company car Stable/predictable workflow Help available if needed

Cons

Always pressured to do more Ability to do job dependent on people answering calls

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thank you for sharing your feedback. We're pleased to hear that you appreciate the independent and flexible scheduling, the company car, the stable and predictable workflow, and the availability of help when needed. We understand your concerns about the pressure to do more and general work-life balance at Verisk. Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial for our employees. If you have specific suggestions on how we can enhance work-life balance, please feel free to share them with your manager or HRBP or through our internal feedback channels, such as the Employee Engagement Survey.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All