Good company - ETL Developer Verisk Employee Review

3.0
Apr 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice Team, values work life balance

Cons

Low salaries, hectic schedule sometimes

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. We believe that a balanced life leads to happier and more productive team members, and we’re delighted that you’ve found our initiatives effective in achieving this balance. Thank you for sharing your insights about your experience at Verisk and for your comments on compensation; offering fair and competitive pay to our team members is important to us. We are constantly evaluating our compensation structures to ensure they align with industry standards. Your input helps us identify how we can evolve our support of employees in compensation.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All