Sometimes a company can be TOO relaxed - Anonymous employee X Employee Review

4.0
Sep 16, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Iconic tech company that everyone has heard of - Friendly colleagues - Great culture for the most part - Very relaxed; great work-life balance - Nice offices with the usual free food and snacks - Good managers for the most part, but I got lucky

Cons

- The culture is maybe too relaxed. There are some very good people at Twitter, but also a lot who are just sitting around collecting paychecks. Was impossible to fire anyone even when they're severely underperforming. - Not very performance oriented, though they're trying to change this. Promotions were mostly based on tenure. - Disorganized, with silos and no clear direction or urgency, and quite risk averse. As a result of this and the other cons I listed above, Twitter struggles to ship. - Kind of high-schoolish. Thankfully I never experienced any beer pong type stuff, but the company seems to celebrate a certain personality type (bombastic and extroverted) regardless of how good their work is. After seeing the same people on stage at company events over and over again, I concluded I was unlikely ever able to rise up to a leadership position here. - Leadership (staff and director level and up) needs to be more diverse. - Lots of splashy and boozy offsites, events, retreats, quarterly planning sessions, but not enough doing. - Of course everything I wrote above is subject to change-- for better or worse-- with Elon in charge

Explore other reviews about X

5.0
Jun 11, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great community for web engineers. lots of mentorship available sessions to knowledge share really helped with growth

Cons

lots of projects do not make it to production lots of hoops before projects have a chance to be developed or make it hopefully to production

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free lunches. Most of the colleagues were nice.

Cons

Vague feedback & lack of structured support: Bi-weekly 1-on-1s tend to be repetitive and lack actionable substance. When mistakes occur, the standard protocol is a vague directive to "review the guidelines" rather than a collaborative review of the actual error. There is a missed opportunity to pair struggling agents with peers for hands-on learning and mentorship. Subjective conflict resolution: Team issues and workflow disruptions are sometimes met with personal assumptions from management (framing issues as a "lack of trust" among peers) rather than objective investigation. Ignoring reported operational issues simply because a manager "wasn't present" to witness them stalls team progress. Sharing constructive details with both parties would allow the team to learn and move forward professionally. Ambush-style offboarding & lack of progressive discipline: The termination process lacks fair, progressive discipline. Rather than addressing performance concerns or alleged errors through transparent, ongoing feedback or structured improvement plans, management tends to weaponize past learning curves (which were previously resolved and followed by praised performance) during the final exit meeting. Dismissing employees abruptly without prior, documented warnings is incredibly damaging to team morale, especially for those managing high-stress workloads in child safety and platform integrity.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All