A developer's perspective in the Prof. Services Dept. - Software Developer iPipeline Employee Review

1.0
Dec 28, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

iPipeline creates a laid back work environment with amazing employees. The employees care about being successful in their jobs and making the project team and department successful. Each of them are willing to help out if you ask. iPipeline also offers a very competitive benefits package which includes a matching 401k program, something that I haven't seen recently.

Cons

As a developer I am forced to develop in a proprietary screen designing system with a proprietary scripting language that is similar to VB script in syntax but not as extensive. The systems that iPipeline develops for it's clients are very simple in nature but become extremely complex because it must be developed inside the proprietary platform. Development is split into two groups, Prof Services and R&D. A lot of tension exists between the two groups mostly because the Prof Services group is expected to implement the solutions that R&D creates. Lastly, loyalty toward the company appears to be gone and are everyone appears to be looking out for themselves.

Explore other reviews about iPipeline

5.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Quality Managers who care. Very good at mentoring and encouraging your career path. The company as a whole sees quality as a priority.

Cons

Townhalls did not celebrate employees and team accomplishments enough. It seemed to be noticed and improving. Executive team seemed to be disconnected from employees at our level. No bonuses. PTO wasn’t as good as other companies.

3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Direct relationship with your immediate boss always seemed to be positive impression ; everyone I spoke with. Very flexible schedule. Solid PTO allotment Individual contributors are genuinely putting in good work and making effort to produce. Just spread thin.

Cons

Needlessly top heavy leadership led to think tanks that never produced meaningful change. No succession planning. Always reactive to a layoff or someone quitting. Institutional knowledge is siloed into one or two individuals on each team. Insanely low pay Low comp for market. Pay is incompatible with level of skill or contribution. Everyone gets roughly the same annual increase. Punitive RTO policy that overreaches on who’s included for a hybrid model. your in office time will be spent on virtual meetings. Feel like it’s intended to justify spending money on a new HQ office, and “updates” to other locations.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All