Takes advantage of employes - Software Engineer iPipeline Employee Review

1.0
Apr 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company itself has no Pros. Anything good about this company has nothing to do with how this company treats it's employees.

Cons

They drastically underpay their developers and they never give bonuses except to high level managers. Every year at the time that raises come around they do something so they can say "Well due to blah blah we aren't able to give the raises we wanted to." And then they turn around at every company meeting and say how well the business is doing and how much money the company is making. The higher ups get paid a crazy amount of money and get huge bonuses, while the people doing the actual work get ripped off and undervalued year after year. They also send out an employee survey every year, but the questions don't actually ask anything that would tell them anything useful and then if they get negative results they just demonstrably lie about the results. Then if they can't convince people of the lie they just blame direct supervisors and tell them they need to be better. It's s survey that is structured to make it look like things are sunshine and rainbows but the company is so bad that they still get bad results from it so they have to lie. The only thing this company cares about is making sure the higher ups get their bonuses.

Explore other reviews about iPipeline

5.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Quality Managers who care. Very good at mentoring and encouraging your career path. The company as a whole sees quality as a priority.

Cons

Townhalls did not celebrate employees and team accomplishments enough. It seemed to be noticed and improving. Executive team seemed to be disconnected from employees at our level. No bonuses. PTO wasn’t as good as other companies.

3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Direct relationship with your immediate boss always seemed to be positive impression ; everyone I spoke with. Very flexible schedule. Solid PTO allotment Individual contributors are genuinely putting in good work and making effort to produce. Just spread thin.

Cons

Needlessly top heavy leadership led to think tanks that never produced meaningful change. No succession planning. Always reactive to a layoff or someone quitting. Institutional knowledge is siloed into one or two individuals on each team. Insanely low pay Low comp for market. Pay is incompatible with level of skill or contribution. Everyone gets roughly the same annual increase. Punitive RTO policy that overreaches on who’s included for a hybrid model. your in office time will be spent on virtual meetings. Feel like it’s intended to justify spending money on a new HQ office, and “updates” to other locations.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All