Toxic - Operations onsemi Employee Review

1.0
Dec 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They pay you to work.

Cons

Disconnect between workers and managers. Layoffs every few months. Poor pay, poor insurance. Toxic managers and leadership. Constantly demanding more output while not creating the conditions to make it possible. Expectation to be flexible while not being flexible themselves. Large bonuses for management (not based on site performance) poor ones for employees (based on site performance). Double, triple and quadruple standards depending on who you are. Retaliation if you speak up about the poor conditions and work environment. Like many companies they say can’t afford to do any better for the employees while boasting about record profits. Posters that speak of teamwork, integrity, leadership and values that the workers are expected to adopt while they themselves exhibit the opposite. Just another company pushing their employees to the absolute maximum, for the absolute least compensation, to maximize their profits to benefit the top tier and leave the rest to worry about whether they’ll be laid off or not every quarter because shareholders and profits are their main priority.

Explore other reviews about onsemi

5.0
Mar 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

has a good work-life balance.

Cons

It has a lot of ups and downs depending on the industry cycle.

1.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offers good pay and benefits. I also had the chance to work with many capable and supportive peers at the same level, which made the day-to-day work more manageable.

Cons

The work environment can feel highly political. The system tends to encourage people to compete or protect themselves instead of collaborating and helping each other succeed. This often creates unnecessary tension between teams and individuals. Local management also needs significant improvement. Instead of helping remove roadblocks and making the work more efficient, they often add extra processes, tasks, and requirements that do not always contribute to the real goal: improving quality and getting meaningful work done. There is a lot of focus on activities that look good on paper, but not enough support for the actual work needed to ensure quality and execution.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All