Families reviews

2.8

47% would recommend to a friend

(19 total reviews)
avatar

Joy Davis, LPC

69% approve of CEO

34% positive business outlook

Families has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 19 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Families employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

19 reviews
1.0
Feb 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In house supervision provided, PTO, and other benefits.

Cons

I was hired on at Families, Inc. shortly after I finished graduate school. On fire for helping others and eager to “save the world”. No one enters this profession without a lit fire that they hope to shed in the dark lives of others. I knew my “save the world” mentality would eventually fade, but I wasn’t ready for my passion to burn out as quickly as it did. That tragedy was not at the hands of my clients or even myself. In my 2.5 years at Families, Inc., I had 5 supervisors. On average, who I answered to, staffed cases, and reported to, changed every 6 months. As soon as I was adjusting to the leadership style of one person, they were gone, or moved on to other roles within the company. This agency seems to have employee performance as their top priority, even over client care. Performance evaluation standards are unrealistic. Despite the difficult standards, in a little over 12 months of working there, I achieved level 5 within the company. At that time, I was told this was the top 15% of the company, across all locations, and something some never achieve — even those practicing for 10+ years. Aside from a simple “good job” and the very small pay raise, my accomplishment was never mentioned again. I was however asked to speak on panels and at recruiting events, neither of which I was compensated or for. Being good at my job attracted more work, while under performers were paid a very similar salary. This bred resentment. The administrative staff is very disconnected from the direct service providers. Micromanaging was the direct tactic chosen by higher level staff, and my clinical judgement seemed to never be trusted, despite it proving to be sufficient time and time again. I was scolded for staffing cases with seasoned colleagues, the sole purpose of supervision. I was belittled for experiencing anxiety during crisis with clients and when I would advocate for myself, my concerns were always minimized. Tact and soft skills were not something administration was familiar with using. My clients trusted me, and I was well liked among them. I saw great progress in their cases. To my knowledge, neither a client nor parent of a client ever complained about the services I provided, yet I was told in a one-on-one meeting that I was “unapproachable” and not personable. I had never been told this in my life. I was beaten, spit on, hit, and kicked by a young client, all witnessed by an admin who said, “I think the child is a fit for treatment.” The same with client’s experiencing on-going and life-threatening psychosis, rather than referring them to a higher level of care. Each client is money to be made and every employee is a number. I passed my LCSW examination and I was told the company would immediatnely begin credentiallying me with private insuracnes. I asked for updates on this process often, and I was shrugged off each time I asked. Finally, after this occurring too many times, resulting in me feeling unsetled, I did some of my own research. The comapny had never begun my credentailing process. If you decide to leave the company, prepare for them to take your advancement or career change personally, and lash out as a result. My notice provided was not honored, and I was told this was best for my clients. Following that, my clients would reach out to me saying they had yet to be assigned a new therapist. Med staff automatically assumes most clients are malingering for disability and/or benzodiazepines, rather than hearing their stories. There were very few times that this felt like an emotionally safe place to work.

2.0
Feb 10, 2023

QBHP

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay and flexible hours.

Cons

Horrible management. Was hired for a full time position, replacing someone else, and no matter how many times I met with my supervisor I was never given a big enough caseload for more than 12-15 hours a week depending on cancellations.

1.0
Jan 19, 2023

Overworked and under respected

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Theres no shortage of clients to see. -CEs available at a reduced amount for employees

Cons

I worked at this company for more than 10 years. It was the best company to work for when I started. The atmosphere was warm and welcoming. It was supportive and enjoyable to be a part of. It is no longer that way. The company has changed a great deal over the years and not for the better. Instead of being warm and supportive, the environment is cold and uncomfortable. Administration has adopted an U.S. vs Them mentality that has only gotten worse over the past few years. They expect an unreasonable amount of work (some people carrying upwards of 80 or more clients on their caseload), intolerable documentation requirements where you get write ups for the smallest of infractions, very little time for continuing education or enriching your practice, and some of the worst pay in the area. The company proved they did not care about the well-being of their employees by announcing pay cuts a week before Christmas and later on instituting performance based pay that could entail possible pay cuts every 6 months. Loyalty and hard work are not valued and the company lacks compassion. Rather than focusing on quality of care for clients and quality of life for their employees, they see everyone as nothing but numbers. Working for this company is likely to lead a clinician to burn out before they’ve even had a chance to get experience in the field. They prefer to give promotions based on favoritism rather than qualifications and experience. They take it personal if an employee leaves to better themselves and their careers. They respond to this by taking vindictive actions against them or (at the very least) giving them the cold shoulder. They promote people with inside connections to other companies over loyal employees who have proven track records of being able to do the job. They do not view therapists as important but treat them as if they are replaceable the way some factories treat their employees. Leaving the company was the best decision I have made. Since leaving I have reconnected with what I like about therapy, made much better pay, and found an environment where I and my skills as a professional are valued.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 19 Reviews

Glassdoor has 25 Families reviews submitted anonymously by Families employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Families is right for you.