There is a "One Freeman" approach that clients are sold on and then their experience on-site can be a bit of a nightmare -- not just for them but for the Freeman team as well. The different Freeman companies become very separate and difficult to maneuver -- there are SOPs for some things that are very loosely interpreted and frequently just non existent. Management doesn't get to see how unprofessional Freeman as a whole looks on site and only hears about it when on-site people are venting about it -- it is a huge problem that seems like only on-site people are directly experiencing it.
The unclear connection between all the Freeman companies makes work difficult to complete and difficult to keep our best foot forward with clients.
There isn't a clear next step for me in my career at Freeman to work toward.
My onboarding was, from what I have heard, better than most. However, I have to give credit directly to my immediate management team -- Again, I've seen how other new employees are left to fend for themselves.
Working with different branches is difficult because each branch does "what they've always done, its always been this way".
Shows that are done every year fall into a rut and end up on autopilot for the teams that works on them.
