employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Gates Foundation

Is this your company?

Gates Foundation Project Manager/Associate Program Officer reviews

3.7

53% would recommend to a friend

(107 total reviews)
avatar

Mark Suzman

79% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

Project Manager/Associate Program Officer employees have rated Gates Foundation with 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 107 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Project Manager/Associate Program Officer professionals have a good working experience there. Gates Foundation is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Project Manager/Associate Program Officer professionals compared to other employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

107 reviews
3.0
Jul 6, 2015

Program Officer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-driven organization, smart people, great access/opportunities to learn about different regions and organizations, and wonderful health benefits (full coverage).

Cons

Lack of transparency at the leadership level, dearth of managers who actually have the experience or desire to develop people, very hard to find career ladder opportunities.

3.0
Mar 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Opportunity to work for an organization that is dedicated to improving the lives of others -Environment where everyone feels passion for the mission -Continual learning opportunities -Amazingly talented and motivated colleagues -Participating in conversations with great thinkers and subject-matter experts -Very good compensation and benefits

Cons

-Culture of perfectionism -Inconsistent experience across the foundation in terms of job satisfaction (brilliant minds do not always translate into great managers) -Lots of fire-drills and seemingly unnecessary churn -Tools and systems are not as sophisticated as needed to support programs/operations -Continual change and tendency towards complexity -Extremely challenging to find work/life balance -Llimited opportunities for career progression

2.0
Oct 1, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the first annual meetings I attended, they listed the people who had been with the foundation for 5yrs & 10 yrs, respectively. I didn't realize until a colleague pointed it out, but the list was almost entirely composed of admin staff. Benefits are great for this sector (retirement savings, travel, etc), but the shelf life of most staff (save admin staff) is about 2 years. On balance, some very talented and smart colleagues with challenging work that is not constrained by resources (not your typical NGO). Seattle campus is well designed.

Cons

I worked as a program officer for the foundation for six years. The mission statement of the foundation is that "All lives have equal value." The largest irony of my work experience at the foundation is that the internal motto should be, "All lives have equal value, except if you're a contract worker, admin staff, someone without direct access to senior leadership, or has Bill and Melinda on speed dial." Your value in this organization is in your job title, and everyone acts accordingly. My short summary: If the work doesn't kill you (they extract as much out of you as possible b/c you are very replaceable), then the work politics will. Just as the foundation is not a perpetual funder, it is NOT a perpetual employer. The work culture and environment is designed to ensure a half life about of 1.5 years for most employees. For an organization that can afford world class technical talent, it's HR division is possibly one of the worst I have witnessed (and I worked in government for a brief period of time). I believe this is by design as a completely incompetent HR division ensures no one sticks around too long. In fact, there are almost no paths for career growth as they expect your shelf life to be less than 2-3 years. One of the pros I list above in terms of resources (and there is a lot of it floating around) creates some of the most bizarre office politics. Type A people (almost 80% of the staff) will trip over themselves to control and command those resources, and if you're in the way (which you mostly are) then you will be thrown under the bus in the name of someone else's glory. It happens often. The first signal I knew something was deeply flawed in this work environment: the marker of a successful team meeting was that no one walked away crying (literally). You will be rewarded for "managing up" towards the senior leadership, but there is almost no accountability for how you manage down or within a team. Kiss up and kick down. You will survive well if you follow this simple principle. In the end, I did a lot of work -- some of it meaningful, but i feel much of it was a lot of hot air pushed by people who wanted to make a mark for themselves in the two years they would be spending at the foundation. This myopia is shameful but omnipresent. But, the organization seems to thrive on it b/c it has the resources to entertain so many vanity trips.

Viewing 88 - 90 of 107 Reviews

Glassdoor has 699 Gates Foundation reviews submitted anonymously by Gates Foundation employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gates Foundation is right for you.