Goldman Sachs reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(19,421 total reviews)
avatar

David M. Solomon

63% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Goldman Sachs has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 19,421 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Goldman Sachs employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

19K reviews
4.0
Dec 27, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I've been at GS since well before the firm went public in 1999. Over that span of time its culture has remained remarkably strong and enduring. Indeed, although there have clearly been ups and downs along the way, all the primary reasons for starting and building a career at GS remain just as relevant today as they have been for years. Namely: 1. Strong culture of teamwork and collaboration. People help each other out. There is a significant focus on helping people succeed, and on nurturing and developing talent. This, in turn, drives some important aspects of the interviewing and hiring process. Conceit is the enemy of collaboration. If you are too convinced of the veracity of your own point of view, you will tend to undermine he team-oriented environment and the objective of getting to the best outcome on any given issue or decision. Therefore, a healthy measure of humility, balanced with a proper level of self-assurance, are key traits for successful candidates. 2. Training and Professional Development. GS has a very extensive range of formal training offerings, although in this regard it does not differ materially from other large, leading organizations. The more important element - and the one that will tend to play a much more relevant role in your career advancement - is the wider culture of coaching, mentorship and apprenticeship that exists in the firm. It is a central element of the way GS works that people take an interest in teaching and developing those beneath them, or even in other areas to whom they have only tangential connections. While there are formal mentoring programs for summer interns and new permanent hires, the more enduring mentoring relationship are the ones that grow informally - and GS is very fertile ground for this. Although the firm is now over 30,000 people, it retains the feel and intimacy of a much smaller firm. 3. Long term career platform. I've worked in multiple divisions and regions with the firm. Most managers' initial instincts are to fill open roles with talent already under the firm's roof. Generally speaking,hiring is on such a scale that there is plenty of need to hire new people from outside the firm. However, the central point is that as an employee, you have access to a very wide variety of opportunities within GS and most people who've been at the firm for any length of time have typically been in a number of different roles or have moved around geographically. Does it work perfectly? No - but an unusual effort is made at all times to get the right people into the right seats. 4. Working with the best. There really are some remarkable people at GS. In many cases, people you work with are the most renowned at what they do in the world. It will take your game to a new level. I've worked personally with hundreds of GS people over time, in all kinds of functions and all kinds of places. Contrary to popular external perception, the people are friendly and the atmosphere collegial. While remarkably talented, people are also remarkably normal. The kinds of people you would be pleased to have a beer with.

Cons

The firm is generally very thinly staffed. When it works well, it provides for a rich and intense experience, rapid learning, great advancement in exposure and responsibility, and fewer people among whom to carve up the spoils. Rapid career advancement is more possible here than at many other places for this same reason. When it does not work well, people are simply asked to do more than they are able to, which can lead to reduced morale and engagement. The kinds of people hired by GS are those who strive for excellence. When they are in such a position as to limit what they can accomplish to the merely ordinary, the drag on morale can be significant. Although this aspect has improved over time, the firm still has a tendency to keep certain long-tenured senior managers for several years beyond their expiration date - well beyond the point where their contribution is particularly meaningful or positive.

1.0
Mar 4, 2017

Associate

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They pay for your licenses/certifications.

Cons

Absolutely terrible compensation. They continually dangle the carrot in front of you with the promise of future salary and bonus increases. The salary and bonus structure is based on a convoluted algorithm that somehow shows an increase in compensation when in actuality your overall pay decreases.The hours are extremely long, and despite the high turnover rate you are expected to pick up the workload for other analyst who have left the firm. They continualy question why morale is so low, and their best remedy is to this is to offer a "jeans day" on Friday's. Ayco has relied on its upstate demographic to justify paying its employees terrible salaries, but unfortunately they are starting to see the ramifications of this via employee turnover at an alarming rate.

3.0
May 1, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked in the Technology division for 5 years. 1. I worked in the technology division of Goldman Sachs and i admire the smart people and technical courage of the company. The company truly believes in technology and is not afraid to build (and invest) in home grown products where all financial companies just live on the mercy of vendors and system integrator. You will be surprised at the scale and complexity of technical projects executed by Goldman on their own without the involvement of any vendor or service integrator. 2. They take great pride and ownership in their work. The company outsources very little and products receive great attention from everyone. Managers pay great attention to detail. Goldman definitely seeks perfection in what they do.

Cons

1. Get used to executive worship culture. Goldman have MDs and Partners and they are living Gods in the corridors. This create a culture of sycophancy and executive pleasing. I have seen people spend their days and nights not on working but pleasing. 2. Very New York Centered. New York is the absolute power center and the managers there will share nothing with anyone else (even with other US cities). In other cities you don't have an authority to do anything without triple New York approval. All important projects are completely controlled out of NY and if you are in other locations you will find that its hard to grow. (or even breathe). 3. Its a company which encourages a culture where people work 20 hours a day. It's common to see colleagues work nonstop from 6:30 AM to Midnight. 4. Organizational Arrogance: Management has very firm views on what needs to be done and you have little or no voice. It takes many years of service for anyone to have a voice in the company. Questioning or disagreement almost always is a career limiting (or ending) move. This arrogance leads to a culture where people spend their entire culture building mega personas, and hyper images of themselves. Its a culture where snobbery thrive. 5. Very rigid organizational rules: Goldman follows lots of processes and governance models around IT. These models are so rigid that even small tasks can take many months of back and forth wrangling between IT and governance teams. This is why executing even small projects takes 10 times the effort it would take in a easy going organization.

Viewing 28 - 30 of 19,421 Reviews

Glassdoor has 23,916 Goldman Sachs reviews submitted anonymously by Goldman Sachs employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Goldman Sachs is right for you.