employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Great Hearts Academies

Engaged Employer

Great Hearts Academies reviews

3.4

51% would recommend to a friend

(496 total reviews)
avatar

Jay Heiler

69% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Great Hearts Academies has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 496 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Great Hearts Academies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

496 reviews
1.0
Apr 24, 2017

Disorganized, managing-to-the-bottom-line cluster

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The classroom still works, but beginning shift. They are straying from their origins and yielding to the demands of wealthy parents. No longer have a true sense of identity.

Cons

I struggle to think of one good thing to say about the Lead Offices. Five CEOs in three years. Chairman of the Board, Development VP, Marketing Director, Facilities Director, and CFO have all left out of frustration or been reorganized. Our organization used to have a mission and values, and yes, we still have them on our website, but those have been reduced to marketing material. GH is no longer a network of liberal arts schools who are focused on bringing a revolutionary education to the masses, but cutting corners, increasing class sizes, increasing school sizes, and decreasing teaching assistant pay.

3.0
May 17, 2015

Important Idea, Poor Execution

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The school has an excellent emphasis with its classical, liberal arts education. Teachers are generally well-motviated and given a lot of autonomy for curricular development. The Socratic method of teaching helps to foster delight in the classroom, improving retention as well as joy with the learning.

Cons

Pay and benefits are poor, as is the work/life balance. Great Hearts is suspicious os general public education, which translates with hiring to a prejudice against people with general education experience in favor of more like-minded graduates from liberal arts schools. This often leads to an imbalance of staff. The rapid growth of the network is also diving teaching talent over a wider area, with little being done in the foreseeable future to make the compensation as competitive as the vaunted education.

1.0
Apr 7, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The students are great, it’s lovely to have summers and holidays off. They are committed to a classical education, and that is exactly what students receive— nothing more or outside of the box.

Cons

Many of the other reviews are spot on about the cons. Lack of transparency from lead office. Lead office continuously goes back on their word and there is a lot of fighting within their tier. Lots of turnover at the academy level as well as the lead office. I’d spent time at the new lead office for meetings and there were maybe 10 people working there at any given time, no one was interacting or seemed happy to be there. This is reflected in some academies. The lead office spent a lot of money for an empty office space when there are academies that don’t have libraries (at a school that teaches from classical literature and supposedly encourages the intellectual pursuit), enough room for their kids, or other building related issues, such as faulty A/c and leaks. Employees are generally not treated well or ignored (my experience) if they bring up reasonable issues, such as asking for temperature controlled working conditions. Some people experience harassment and I did not see any justice from these situations or acknowledgement of the problem from those in higher positions. There is turnover in HR, which means there is not always someone to go to when there is a problem at work. The flow chart for the org is a mess. Hard for women to advance; lead office is majority white man. Strong Christian identity that spills into classroom experience (outside of the curriculum— some are teaching religious opinion and facilitating in-kind discussion. These are public charter schools), kids told me they were very uncomfortable. There is major controversy surrounding the validity of trans students. Students are not allowed to have certain clubs due to factors of exclusivity, even for clubs for underrepresented students (multicultural, GSA, etc). Worked there for three years and did not receive a raise. Some Headmasters are great, but most are undereducated about how to effectively lead a school and seem to be in the role for the title and less for the experience. Lots of egos to manage. Teachers have not all received proper training. Most lack teaching degrees and it shows.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 496 Reviews

Glassdoor has 508 Great Hearts Academies reviews submitted anonymously by Great Hearts Academies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Great Hearts Academies is right for you.