employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integral Ad Science

Engaged Employer

Integral Ad Science reviews

3.6

54% would recommend to a friend

(39 total reviews)
avatar

Lisa Utzschneider

72% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

39 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Apr 15, 2020

Not Meeting Expectations/Needs Improvement

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Technology is in-demand in the market and has a good business model. I came across plenty of smart, capable folks who genuinely wanted to help their coworkers and clients be successful. Coworkers are typically super friendly and I've made great connections along the way. Free lunches once a week, some snacks in the offices. Free beer/wine on tap. Definite work/life balance compared to other companies.

Cons

No opportunity for equity, so employees have no skin in the game, no loyalty to the company. This creates tension because we know who will get paid out when IAS gets sold again, and it won't be the employees who were forced to sell their equity to Vista. Toxic alcohol culture reinforced by the company since offices always have beer/wine on tap -- this is seen as a benefit by some. One may observe how normalized drinking is at IAS, in a very old-school kind of way where certain employees seem to consistently drink . IAS supports alcohol consumption more-so than employees being fit and active; I don't need you to buy me booze, AND it'd be great if you reallocated resources to facilitate employee health and wellness. Company isn't compensating employees based on their market value or performance, even if roles and responsibilities change. Bonus scoring arbitrary. For example, recent changes were made from the top down where bonuses were suddenly "recalibrated" including an arbitrary Vista score (A, B, C, D etc) resulting in lower bonuses across the board than ever before. This was POORLY communicated to employees. My manager discouraged me from fighting for a well-deserved raise. Too many managers, first time managers (this is a BIG ONE) and middlemen to leadership, so if you're a lower level employee or individual contributor even if you communicate a gap, things are unlikely to change. The rate of change is painfully slow. Constant change in leadership, folks coming and going. As an employee/IC, it may feel like you are expected to continually prove yourself to someone new who may not even be around to see through to or be invested in your successes. IAS is a pretty large company, and unfortunately even with the best intentions the CEO can only affect so much change in so much time. Current leadership for certain teams is still figuring out how to forge career paths within the company, so unless your goal is to become a manager there are no opportunities for advancement and won't be for some time, opportunity cost for employees leading to attrition. Poor and toxic leadership in some cases not only goes unnoticed, but may even get promoted (360 reviews anyone??). For example, I have been personally chastised by certain leadership in a very unprofessional way and was assured their boss would address (with seemingly no change or positive result). And hearing from multiple employees that HR complaints have already been submitted with no results further discouraged me from addressing.

3.0
Jun 18, 2019

Toxic environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Location, snacks and unlimited PTO

Cons

Low wages, no room for growth and middle management.

4.0
May 10, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Super relaxed . environment. Engineering especially is laid back. Any commitments are made only after taking in feedback from developers and developers have plenty of time and room to voice their opinions on deadlines. Definitely helps in having a good work life balance. Not to mention the free meals. And silicon valleyesque atmosphere. There are issues, but not major. Reducing bureaucracy and firing some top management will work wonders

Cons

Engineering leadership just does not deserve to be there. People at the top are simply not capable of handling day to day decisions that concern their employees. To add to that, there is a notion of hiring at the top. Engineering doesnt work? Well let us hire 15 new Directors to fix it. Or promoting junior level folks to higher positions is just not the way. Managers need to manage, engineers need to develop. Just because someone is a good developer, doesnt automatically make them a good leader. Definitely not a great VP.

Viewing 31 - 33 of 39 Reviews

Glassdoor has 402 Integral Ad Science reviews submitted anonymously by Integral Ad Science employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Integral Ad Science is right for you.