Jacobs reviews

4.0

81% would recommend to a friend

(7,764 total reviews)
avatar

Bob Pragada

90% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

Jacobs has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 7,764 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Jacobs employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
3.0
Feb 7, 2010

Working at Jacobs Engineering

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the top companies in the field, and it continues to do well and have a large back log in spite of the difficult economic times.

Cons

As a consulting firm Jacobs is focused on billable hours. Employees without enough billable hours are at risk of losing their job. Also, because Jacobs is public held, and it is primarily concerned with shareholder value, it focuses way too closely at the quarter by quarter results. One more thing, if you are a woman you will have difficulty advancing. Although Jacobs is trying to make itself a good environment for women, as is typical of engineering firms, the high level core business positions are held predominately by white men. There are some women high up now, in HR, IT, Inside Sales, and PR positions.

1.0
Feb 6, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

9/80 work schedule, which means you get every other Friday off (not because you deserve it, but because you work 9hr days). Workload and work type is very light compared to other companies (particularly those in the non-DoD world). Matching 401K contributions. If you're looking for a place to "hunker down for a while" during the economic downturn, and you can get on a project at Tybrin that has funding for a year or so (or however long you're looking for a port in the storm), then there are worse places than Tybrin.

Cons

Process, Process, Process - Tybrin believes that process produces quality (and that people and their talent have nothing to do with results). All process does is ensure consistency of results, not quality. Incompetent management - their technical skills are stuck circa 2000 - 2001 and some even earlier (like 1996) and they have no interest in considering advice given by people who have a much more in-depth knowledge about current and emerging software engineering techniques, standards and tools; communication between upper management and employees is almost non-existent (the most recent layoff a good example thereof). Professional growth - if it's technical you desire, Tybrin's not for you. If you're looking for a management path, and you fit in with the management crowd (it's a personality contest - it's not about competence or skills) then you can cruise along at Tybrin (until you fall out of favor and/or there's a layoff). Oh - did I mention Process? They think CMMI level 3 means a convoluted process and chain of command are how things (should) get done in the real world. Pity they don't realize that just about everything they use to do their current jobs and live their lives at home comes from non-CMMI level 3 companies (and that the CMMI people/academics themselves don't even use CMMI processes to develop the (worthless) CMMI philosophy).

1.0
Feb 4, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours, 4 1/2 day workweek

Cons

Management ENCOURAGES an almost caste like system. The higher level managers watch out for their "men", and the lower levels are treated like lowly servants. Lower levels are obviously not worthy of anything more in their eyes There is no emphasis on career path, mentoring, or self improvement/education. In fact, management often communicates during review time that the lower levels are not eligible to receive higher performance ratings because those scores are reserved for management and above (most, if not all, of which are men). Furthermore, they approach your review with the viewpoint that it has to be low to encourage you to work harder and have room to grow. (Oh, and then that's their justification for why you get a miniscule raise... you don't deserve it because you didn't earn it!) In past jobs, my assessment reviewed the quality of my work for the past year, not my potential for the coming. It's a good ol' boy system in the worst way, and the floundering, near bankrupt companies that Jacobs acquires brings aboard poor quality management that if not eliminated or at least reigned in could lead to your demise. After all, there is a reason that their previous companies were tanking under their leadership. Morale is HORRIBLE and gets worse with each passing day. Everyone is just waiting for the economy to rebound so they can leave.

Viewing 7678 - 7680 of 7,764 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,805 Jacobs reviews submitted anonymously by Jacobs employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Jacobs is right for you.