employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Kestra Financial

Is this your company?

Kestra Financial reviews

2.2

24% would recommend to a friend

(180 total reviews)
avatar

James Poer

24% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

Kestra Financial has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 180 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Kestra Financial employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

180 reviews
1.0
Feb 23, 2026

Toxic Culture driven from the top, hiding behind “Growth”

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most Kestra employees are good people and genuinely pleasant to work with. Day-to-day coworkers are not the problem.

Cons

Toxicity is driven from the top. Leadership prioritizes optics and narrative control over accountability, transparency, and employee well-being. Employees were explicitly pressured to post positive Glassdoor reviews to counteract ongoing negative feedback. Instead of addressing why these reviews exist, leadership focused on trying to bury them. Compensation is not competitive. You must negotiate aggressively at hire because annual raises are minimal to nonexistent. Bonus pools are routinely underfunded (often around half-funded), despite leadership repeatedly emphasizing revenue growth in town halls. The disconnect is glaring. New hires are frequently paid more than existing employees with greater experience. Loyalty is not rewarded, which has fueled attrition. HR is a major contributor to the toxic culture.In 2025, HR had more turnover than any other department. Policies are rolled out without understanding downstream impact, and when problems arise, blame is pushed onto other teams. There is an excessive focus on monitoring employee activity and internal “click” metrics, creating a culture of surveillance rather than support. Employees feel watched, not trusted. Many long-tenured employees resigned in 2025 as the culture continued to deteriorate. Leadership frames this as “growth,” but much of the hiring is simply backfilling roles left by burned-out employees.

1.0
Feb 14, 2026

A Private Equity Profit Engine at the Expense of Employee Wellbeing

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented Peers: I worked with many incredible, dedicated individuals I truly enjoyed partnering with. • Solid Business Model: From an advisor's perspective, Kestra is a high-performing "P/E darling" with a clear strategy for growth. • The "Foot in the Door": If you need a role immediately, take it—but keep your resume updated and stay active in your search.

Cons

The Endless P/E Consultant Cycle: Kestra is in a perpetual state of P/E funding rounds, which triggers a predictable but damaging cycle. Management brings in high-priced consultants to "fix" or "optimize" workflows. In reality, these consultants lack institutional knowledge and simply create more work for actual employees—either through redundant reporting or by leaving behind broken processes once their contracts expire. • Loss of Institutional Knowledge: Because of the culture, most employees with legacy knowledge have departed. The "consultant-first" mentality has replaced actual internal growth, leaving the remaining staff to pick up the pieces of a fragmented system. • Compensation & Surveillance: Pay consistently sits below industry norms for nearly every role. This is compounded by the use of intrusive tracking software to monitor "productivity" during standard business hours, creating a culture of micro-management rather than trust. • Leadership & HR Direction: Under the current HR leadership, the department feels more like a "fixer" for a distressed company than a support system for talent. There is a glaring lack of accountability at the executive level for unprofessional behavior. • Unprofessional Executive Culture: In quarterly meetings, there have been instances where comments regarding the appearance of younger, male employees felt highly inappropriate and exclusionary. This creates a clear double standard that would never be tolerated if roles were reversed. • The "Exit Mind-Fuck": Leaving Kestra feels like leaving a toxic relationship. The lack of clear communication, training, and manager accountability leaves you feeling like an "imposter", never achieving goals, constantly behind, not feeling like your labor is good enough, and internalizing all those feelings, even when you are doing the work of multiple people.

1.0
Feb 3, 2026

Forced Positive Reviews Incoming

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

See below cons for update.

Cons

Please know that employees are actively being solicited to write a positive Glassdoor review by senior leadership, with a paced cadence so that they can tell when each department is or isn’t sending in their reviews. You may see a couple 4-5 star reviews pop up - I noticed the most recent five star review mentions how ActivTrak was installed to “preserve a Friday work from home day.” The translation on this is: we use ActivTrak as an excuse to make HR relevant. Does that sound like a review a sincere human being would write? Kestra can give any work from home days it wants. It chooses not to, and that’s fine. Please do not work here if you do not have to. Things like this are what the executive staff are focused on - not serving advisors , growing the business, or allowing the employee experience to breathe - but instead taking the shortcut to make a mess go away. A 2.2 star average is one of the lowest I’ve seen on Glassdoor for the volume of reviews Kestra has.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 180 Reviews

Glassdoor has 208 Kestra Financial reviews submitted anonymously by Kestra Financial employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Kestra Financial is right for you.