Merck KGaA reviews

4.0

80% would recommend to a friend

(2,091 total reviews)
avatar

Kai Beckmann

66% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

Merck KGaA has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 2,091 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Merck KGaA employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Oct 9, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. Not a single one.

Cons

I worked at the Glasgow site. I won’t name the department as I do not wished to be identified. When I was there I was constantly picked on, I had a manager scream at me in a corridor, I was bullied, belittled, and was in a department where nobody wanted to work. We saw the manager for 10 minutes in the morning unless something went wrong. Everyone was out to stab each other in the back and it was just so, so toxic. In the months since leaving, I have met other former employees who have had similar experiences either in person or they’ve reached out on line. Staff turnover is through the roof, training is a joke, oh and expect to be given a chewing out for simple things like entry errors when any other employer is happy to accept that minor mistakes happen and that you corrected it. Also, never expect to finish on time. Management do not know how to manage workload. Staying an extra 2 hours ever other day was pretty normal. On a side note, there was also zero (0) diversity in my department. Gotta love blatant bias eh? How higher up the food chain at Merck hasn’t clocked on to this I have no idea.

5.0
Mar 5, 2020

Happy to be part of Merck Family

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• We get around 40 paid leaves per year as per revised policies • Unlimited Work from anywhere option • Provides Child care facility with 100% reimbursement • Freedom to switch to different roles based on our interest and skills • Very transparent management team • Transport facility and food provided at very low cost • Encourages more women employees especially for leadership roles • Flexible timings

Cons

• Initially shift timings were difficult to balance personal life. But then got flexibility to change to general shift.

1.0
Jul 26, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People in the lab are friendly. You can get working experience in the biotech industry.

Cons

Workload- Initially you will wait to be trained in something worthwhile for a minimum of 6 weeks. Immediately following limited, irregular and poorly organised training, you will be expected to take on a full workload in the lab. This is in addition to lab housekeeping, project work and using or updating outdated and barely usable protocols/documents.New starts become demotivated, in some cases waiting more than 3 months to be trained in what they were employed to do in the first place. Blame culture in the company is rife leaving everyone to adopt a "look out for number one" attitude. Senior management try to employ schemes and plans that could make a difference. However, this is never monitored at ground level to see if it is being employed successfully. The message gets lost or more likely ignored at middle management who continuously push deadlines for tasks on to their department. This then becomes your job- continuously trying to complete massive tasks or projects in a very limited time frame with little to no help to achieve your goals. Career Development- Not much to say here, in my time at the company I was never shown anything to do with career progression despite senior management saying it was a"key area". The exception to this rule would be the customary "you've been here a year" promotion and salary increase to something you probably expected to get when you joined. After this promotion, look forward to supervisors giving you their whims and errands as they can't be bothered to actually go down to the labs and engage situations directly. Pay- "equipment under £10k is peanuts" yet a fair salary must be akin to a diamond as these are rare and extremely hard to come by. Management- My department was ran by a somewhat autocratic manager with a limited grasp on both where the labs are physically located in the building as well as what actually goes on there. Supervisors are either never in work to begin with or too indecisive to do anything. Decisions which affect the lab are regularly made by people who do not have an idea of processes there or how it will affect the people that work there daily. For them, this ticks a box on a spreadsheet thus "mission accomplished". Facilities/labs- The labs are somewhat like a scrapyard, full of old obsolete equipment, while new equipment sits gathering dust for at least a year before it is actually able to be used. Any usable space is highly coveted and difficult to find. A corporate technique was employed to organise the labs so they could "shine". This brings to mind a certain phrase- you can't polish a turd. The company has recently been acquired by Merck which apart from a few nice coloured signs- making the place look like a cheap legoland- hasn't really amounted to much in terms of actually working there.

Viewing 190 - 192 of 2,091 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,906 Merck KGaA reviews submitted anonymously by Merck KGaA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck KGaA is right for you.