Merck Engineering Scientist Associate reviews

4.2

85% would recommend to a friend

(292 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

91% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Associate Scientist, Engineering employees have rated Merck with 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 292 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals have an excellent working experience there. Merck is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

292 reviews
2.0
Jan 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation is good (salary, benefits, health care) and the colleagues are smart, hard working and truly want to do the best for the drug industry.

Cons

Lack of direction. Many changes that have slowed the science down--and give a false impression of innovation. No one to take responsibility for decisions.

3.0
Dec 19, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyone from my department's director down is great

Cons

Constant fear of layoffs Upper management nickle and dime'ing employees benefits General uncertainty about the future of the company

4.0
Dec 12, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working environment is generally enjoyable. The scientists are dedicated, hardworking and easy to work with in a good team structure. Mid-level management is giving it there all.

Cons

Management is all over the board. There is no plan. The higher ups throw word salad at middle management and expect them to hit a moving target. They infrastructure was already taxed and the staffing is now down to a shoestring. The current scientific format will not bear fruit.

Viewing 265 - 267 of 292 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,185 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.