NIH reviews

4.1

80% would recommend to a friend

(2,340 total reviews)
avatar

Francis S. Collins

82% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

NIH has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,340 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The NIH employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
4.0
Jul 9, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Secure job working for governement the work isn't very hard and you have plenty of time to complete it the only problem is that everybody doesn't alwasy know what they are doing and if you have questions at times you have to wait a long time for an answer

Cons

Theres so much beuracracy and people working there at times it can be repetititve. Also you have to talk to like fifty peoople and fill out all sorts of forms if you wanna get anything done.

4.0
Jul 9, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Interesting work based on the study of rare and complex diseases; the work can be very gratifying when it benefits a patient or contributes meaningfully to the scientific literature -Collaboration with world renowned scientists -Cutting edge technology -Good choice of benefit plans (Health/Dental/Vision/Life Insurance) -Full access to scientific journals, excellent library resources -Daily scientific presentations open to all staff -Creativity is encouraged (though not necessarily rewarded) -Job security -Generous leave after 15 years (1 day per 2-week pay period)

Cons

-Some post-docs, desperate to publish, take credit for your work -Authorship is political; PHDs and MDs often get honorary authorship, regardless of their contribution (if any), and may be placed within the top three authors even though other authors may have had greater contributions -Career growth is slow, even if your performance evaluations are outstanding and you are a strong self-advocate -Good old boy network; glass ceiling once you reach a certain level -Funds for attending scientific conferences are non-existent, unless you are an MD or PhD -Expensive cafeteria with low quality food -Getting an advanced degree, such as a Masters, may not lead to a promotion, and tuition assistance is stingy ($1000 per year) -Essential employees (all Clinical Center employees except administrative staff) must take annual leave, even when unusually severe inclement weather makes it impossible to travel to work (e.g. blizzard of 2010, 1+ foot of snow, whiteout conditions, public transportation shut down) -Many of the older buildings on the NIH campus are in poor condition (plumbing leaks; crumbling plaster; grimey, dirty, nasty bathroom facilities); housekeeping is slack in Building 10; fruit flies and enormous roaches abound -Must walk a long way from parking to place of work, unless you are an MD

3.0
Jul 7, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting research in the study of rare diseases Productive collaboration among different Institutes and investigators Networking opportunities Multi-cultural environment as many post-doctoral fellows are foreign

Cons

Some post-doctoral fellows, desperate to publish, take credit for your work Having an advanced education may not necessarily advance your career Authorship is sometimes not based on merit, but political favors

Viewing 2314 - 2316 of 2,340 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,841 NIH reviews submitted anonymously by NIH employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NIH is right for you.