employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Instruments

Is this your company?

National Instruments Hardware Engineering reviews

3.2

26% would recommend to a friend

(39 total reviews)

Alex Davern

Not enough data to show CEO approval

1% positive business outlook

Hardware Engineering employees have rated National Instruments with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 39 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Hardware Engineering professionals have a good working experience there. National Instruments is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Hardware Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

39 reviews
2.0
Oct 19, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a large variety of different products made by national instruments which can give you the opportunity to learn about a wide array of technologies. Since the average age of the employees at the company is pretty low you can have the opportunity to get very involved in projects early in your career if you have the motivation to go after these opportunities. There are a handful of very knowledgeable technical people there who are great sources to help get you going if you can find them. The working environment is casual and for the most part the company is pretty forgiving about honest mistakes.

Cons

The management at NI is the single greatest downside of the company. The company recruits heavily for a position known as AE (application engineering) which puts people in a program known as ELP (engineering leadership program). These people are basically expected to do the technical support for 1-3 years and then have to move on to another area of the company. A lot of times this ends up being Sales or Marketing but you also get a fair amount working in R&D. Most of the R&D management came through this path at some point and while they are not bad people they really don't have the technical or managerial experience to be in this kind of management role. This leads to a lot of frustration for the technical folks. Overall it seems like the company never figured out how to deal with the fact it had grown so much so fast and now is just floundering around trying to make the old formula fit the current situation.

2.0
Sep 24, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting technology, very smart people.

Cons

Some first-line and middle managers have learned that the way to get ahead is to: 1) Assign your work to an underling so you can spend all your time sucking up to your boss; 2) Take all the credit for your team members' accomplishments; and 3) Have someone to throw under the bus when something goes wrong.

3.0
Sep 2, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to start a career right out of college. Lots of smart people around and lots to learn. From a technical point of view, you will learn more in the first two years there than you did in all of your college education. Benefits and salaries are OK, but not a place to get rich. If you are salaried, you are eligible for restricted stock units, which are actually worth something. The employee stock purchase plan is always a good deal as well -- again, don't expect to get rich, but if you put some money in, and can afford to sell on the peaks, you will do very well. Job security is great -- do your job well and you will *never* have to worry about losing your job. Dress code is casual and there is more or less an open door policy.

Cons

Management in general is VERY inexperienced. Upper, Middle and lower management is composed of application engineers. Most of these guys aren't technically competent and have zero management skills. Not their fault, and a lot of them don't have much of a choice of where to go if they want to stay, but still very detrimental to the company morale. Project managers are also (mostly) clueless application engineers, and drive many good technical people away. In practice, getting promoted is 100% up to your direct manager (as opposed to your good work). If he/she does not make a conscious effort to 'boost your image', you will never get noticed, no matter how good you are. Some very talented people have been around for almost 8 years and have not made 'senior' engineer. Because many young managers are usually way in over their heads, and too concerned with staying afloat, growing their employees is not near the top of their priorities. Recognition for releasing products is usually short lived, and in the form a 'good job' and not much else, while marketing employees regularly receive cash bonuses. The company has a growth goal of 20-40%, and that is the basis for calculating the bonus check at the end of the year. This is fine for a small company, but when your sales are almost $800M, 20% growth is *really* hard to achieve, never mind 40%. Every time there is a financial update it goes something like 'Well we only grew 13%.." or "We only grew 15%".

Viewing 34 - 36 of 39 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,930 National Instruments reviews submitted anonymously by National Instruments employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if National Instruments is right for you.