PHMG reviews

3.4

54% would recommend to a friend

(842 total reviews)
avatar

Jason Daye

55% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

PHMG has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 842 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PHMG employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

842 reviews
1.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. They are incredibly resilient. The bond we have as a team is one of the reasons most of us are still there. The support we offer to help manage our days, workloads and to hit targets, is second to none. Direct management, Adam and Tim. They are stuck in the middle of such a difficult situation. Trying to make sure the operational changes are put in effect, whilst trying to argue our corner is a tough act to balance. They keep us driving and make sure we're as informed as possible. It needs to made clear, thelis review is in no way a reflection of their management.

Cons

Commission Structure The commission structure has changed significantly over time. Previously, earnings were based on a combination of resolved accounts, retention (save rate), and a separate credit KPI. The revised model now focuses on a capped commission structure based on save rate combined with credit issued per pound of retained revenue. While intended to align performance measures, the practical outcome has been a noticeable reduction in achievable on-target earnings compared to previous years. Annual Leave and Performance Metrics A previous pro-rata system protected performance metrics when employees took annual leave by adjusting results to reflect their average performance across the month. This ensured that taking holiday did not negatively impact commission or KPIs. The removal of this process means annual leave now has a direct impact on performance, as customer accounts continue to churn while employees are away with no mechanism to offset this. As a result, taking earned annual leave can adversely affect both KPIs and commission. Salary Progression Although a salary increase was introduced, it was effectively offset by a reduction in available on-target earnings, meaning overall earning potential remained unchanged. There is currently no structured salary review process or annual increase to reflect inflation or recognise long-term service and performance. Increasing Workload and Administrative Burden Operational changes have significantly increased administrative workload without a corresponding adjustment to performance expectations. The business continues to rely on an outdated CRM system that requires extensive manual logging for almost every customer interaction, despite ongoing discussions over several years regarding its replacement. In addition, task-based workload management has been introduced. While initially presented as a tool to improve organisation and efficiency, it has increasingly become a performance monitoring mechanism, with regular reminders and follow-up from management regarding outstanding tasks. Combined with existing reporting requirements and the expectation to contact every customer at least every seven days, this has added considerable administrative pressure while reducing time available for customer engagement. Job Security and Communication The ongoing trial of allowing Account Managers to manage their own retention cases has understandably created uncertainty for the specialist retention team. Employees have raised concerns about the long-term future of their roles, but there has been little communication or reassurance regarding the direction of the department. Despite this uncertainty, the team continues to deliver consistently strong results. Operational Changes Affecting Performance Changes to operational processes have made performance targets increasingly difficult to achieve. The working period for each account has reduced from 90 days to 60 days, with the possibility of a further reduction to 45 days. Alongside increased manual account reviews and changes to how churn is managed, these adjustments have resulted in significantly higher churn rates and reduced opportunities to meet commission thresholds. While expectations have remained high, employees have less control over many of the factors that now influence their performance.

1.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people continue to be the best part of the department and I consider a lot of people here friends; despite increasing pressure, the team remains supportive, knowledgeable and genuinely committed to doing the right thing for clients and each other. There are many experienced employees who care deeply about the company and want to see it succeed.

Cons

Over the last year, Client Services has become an increasingly difficult department to work within. What was once a department built around collaboration, experience and supporting one another has gradually become one driven almost entirely by metrics, constant change and uncertainty. There has been a huge change in the operational structure and it’s changed for the worse. The biggest concern for many of us is job security. For months there has been ongoing uncertainty surrounding the future of roles within the department, with very little reassurance from senior leadership. We continue to be asked to perform at a high level while not knowing what the future of our positions looks like. It's difficult to remain engaged when you constantly feel your role could change or disappear with little notice. We are constantly criticised based on expectations that change frequently, being given an unrealistic framework to adhere to when our bases were too high and we were inheriting poor work from individuals moving to other departments. This uncertainty is made worse by the fact that targets never seem to stand still. KPIs and performance measures change regularly, making it difficult to know what success actually looks like and our pay is being impacted by this. Every month feels like a different target, a different focus and a different way of being measured. Rather than creating stability, it creates frustration and makes us feel like we are constantly chasing moving goalposts. The introduction of the current trial has only added to these concerns. Rather than reducing pressure, it has blurred responsibilities between departments and is asking employees to carry out work they never applied to do. Concerns around pressure, workload, capacity, and security have been raised repeatedly by both departments being impacted, yet they have had little impact on the direction being taken. Collaboration is now non-existent and an atmosphere of us vs. them is now the prevailing culture across the department. Perhaps the biggest disappointment has been becoming an Employee Owned Trust. We were told this would give us more of a voice and greater involvement in decisions affecting the business. In reality, we are further away from decision making than ever before. Significant changes continue to be implemented with little meaningful consultation, leaving the employee ownership model feeling more like a slogan than something reflected in everyday working life. What makes all of this particularly frustrating is the contrast with the messaging from leadership. At the company conference in January, accountability and ownership were presented as core values that employees were expected to demonstrate. Yet those same principles don't appear to apply to the decisions being made at a senior level. Departments continue to be restructured, expectations continue to change, and we are simply expected to adapt without clear explanations or reassurance. Accountability should exist at every level of the organisation, not just among those on the front line. We don't object to change. We object to feeling unheard, undervalued and uncertain. There are still many talented, dedicated employees who want PHMG to succeed, but that becomes increasingly difficult when trust, transparency and stability continue to decline.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 842 Reviews

Glassdoor has 848 PHMG reviews submitted anonymously by PHMG employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PHMG is right for you.