Pearson Associate Editor/Production Editor reviews

4.2

99% would recommend to a friend

(5 total reviews)
avatar

Omar Abbosh

Not enough data to show CEO approval

99% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

5 reviews
3.0
Aug 19, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great co-workers Manager fought to extend contract Generous with software/hardware updates

Cons

*No training. Editors and associate editors started running with no idea of the scope of their authority to audit/edit/rewrite material on which they were working. *Freezing office all year round. *Use of terminology which is not standard in publishing; it took me about two weeks to realize that when they were referring to "minis" in documents, they meant "thumbnail" images. *Although good at updating software and desktop hardware, way way way behind in fully utilizing publishing tools available. Editors should be working in InCopy, not doing mark ups in pdf to go back to outsourced comp vendors. Cumbersome, awkward, and rife with the possibility for propagating errors. *Rah Rah e-mails and updates from CEO, versus whole floors of empty cubicles and offices and co-workers disappearing with no warning.

2.0
Jul 10, 2012

Running in place

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

benefits, wonderful coworkers, back bay location

Cons

outrageously busy from march-august, oct-nov, do not hire enough people during the summer rush, work 10-12 hour days under extreme pressure without pay, includes weekends, never praised, in fact routinely accused of being wrong. not uncommon to hear women crying in the ladies room due to stress of not having enough time to make a deadline.

Viewing 4 - 5 of 5 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,541 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.