Pfizer reviews

3.7

69% would recommend to a friend

(8,723 total reviews)
avatar

Albert Bourla

49% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Pfizer has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 8,723 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pfizer employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

9K reviews
1.0
Feb 4, 2015

Don't Get Owned by the OWN IT culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, good benefits, ability to work from home. Organization changes often. If you don't like you're job, it will eventually change.

Cons

No work life/balance - project managers openly state that working nights and weekends are built in to project timeline assumptions. R&D organization changes so often that no one really knows the expectations of their own role or the roles of others on their team. This results in a lack of accountability.

3.0
Sep 24, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pfizer's compensation is one of the best reasons to work there. They typically pay higher salaries and have a much better benefits package than equal jobs in other companies. The higher compensation has the added benefit of drawing a wide range of fairly qualified people. The colleagues I work with are generally very intelligent and understand there job responsibilities. The benefits -- medical, dental, vision, insurance options, including the potential of signing up for a legal plan -- are excellent. They are also much less expensive than other places. (It pays to be big!) They also allow the flexibility to choose from different options to tailor your own coverage.

Cons

The high compensation has some downsides. It tends to attract people, who are very educated and intelligent, but who don't necessarily have the impetus to work as a team. At least in the location where I worked, there tended to be an "every man for himself" attitude. Furthermore, many people who had been there for a number of years felt entitled. The attitude extends to promotion practices and opportunities for growth. Pfizer touts there "open job posting" system, but in my experience this is only a cover. Decisions on promotions and new positions are made by a few people and are often based on who you know, not what you are qualified for. The open job posting system also allows for managers to "wash their hands" of any responsibility in promotion or development of their employees. While I agree that it should be the employee's responsibility to manage his/her own career, many employees don't have insight into what other positions really mean or what they might be qualified for -- especially in such a large company.

1.0
Mar 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of valuable patient data to analyze. Good pay and benefits.

Cons

At Pfizer, the statistics function can sometimes feel underprioritized, with competing project deadlines creating constant urgency and limited respect for bandwidth. Following the Seagen merger, there has also been a noticeable shift toward a more aggressive, visibility-driven culture. Meetings can feel performative, with an emphasis on speaking up rather than driving substantive discussion or decision-making. Overall, this environment may be challenging for someone who is focused on producing rigorous, thoughtful statistical work

Viewing 64 - 66 of 8,723 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,055 Pfizer reviews submitted anonymously by Pfizer employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pfizer is right for you.