Postscript reviews about "team"

-startup culture at times -very founder focused

- LOTS of layoffs. Bound to happen in tech, but in less than two years there were multiple rounds of layoffs, including a larger RIF - Like other reviews mention, lots of emphasis and power given to senior leadership with shady/limited comms shared to the rest of the team. They claim there are cutbacks (above mentioned layoffs), yet senior leaders are on offsites a few times a month. - Pay is not on par with industry standards and hard to get meaningful promotions based on the corporate competencies structure they expect you to follow. Yet, many roles have blurred lines and responsibilities that don’t fall in line with their competency structure. - If you are not buddy buddy with senior leader and/or in a role that draws a lot of company attention or impact, good luck trying to advance or be given new opportunities you express interest in. - As other reviews mention, they do not operate as a mature startup and still seem to fly by the seat of their pants

There has been some change in strategy lately, but I think that's mostly driven by a desire to win and management paying attention to how the market is evolving. And it does seem to be working. But It's not a place of stasis.

Remote only is not for everyone. Requires a lot of autonomy. Postscript rewards people based on performance. If you are not a high performer, you will not be rewarded.

Salary growth / opportunity for review is slow Engineering culture / performance is spiky across teams, you might have radically different experiences based on the team you're in Difficult cultural transformation happening in the company as we shift to AI native