Quantcast reviews

3.3

59% would recommend to a friend

(535 total reviews)
avatar

Konrad Feldman

63% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

Quantcast has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 535 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Quantcast employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

535 reviews
1.0
Jul 26, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Dublin office is very well located. It comes with the usual perks that you now see in high tech companies : flexible workspaces, breakfast and lunch, yoga classes... The technology is very impressive and there is a lot to wow your customers. If you want to get into real time advertising, Quantcast is very advanced. However the strategy for growth renders the quality of the solution completely pointless. The sales methodology and sales training is excellent. If only the sales team and the managers put that into real practice instead of just repeating the keywords like parrots!

Cons

Quantcast has a bad track record when it comes to managing people. I had seen negative reviews before I joined, and I heard negative feedback from my personal network including recruiting agencies. The team I interviewed with for sales convinced me it would be just fine. Little did I know that it was going to be such a mess. Here's what I struggled with: - Don't get fooled by the titles! A sales manager is in reality an account executive in charge of new business. - Inexperienced managers who have never worked outside of Ireland but need to cover areas like DACH, Southern Europe or Israel and have no clue - No territory policy : I ran a report in Salesforce which showed me that just before someone joins the company, the other AEs put the "juicy" accounts under their name and sit on them just by principle. - This means that new people are not allocated a fair and relevant patch, and are left with either cold accounts or accounts with no budget. - This also means that sales people are fighting for the same accounts and it fosters a culture of mistrust. - Managers refuse to discuss the territory issues and will beat you on the head about your quotas even though you have a dry patch. - If you join as an AE, you may eventually be promoted to senior AE, but after that it's limbo. Teams are too small to require more managers, and there is no career path to a field role. Since I left, the SDR programme seems to have been scrapped. some markets have been closed down and a large number of people in leadership roles have left (voluntarily or not). When it comes to people, everyone is smart and capable. But here's very little recognition from managers: they put more value on someone who's been in the company for 15 months than on someone who brings more sales experience. It's very difficult to change the way things are done, however hard the sales enablement team tries (and God knows they try and they're good). Cases of bullying are frequent. Usually brushed under the carpet. It's particularly true in the local offices in continental Europe. Commissions are not calculated on the amount of the deal you closed. They're calculated based on the budget invoiced to the customer and paid on a quarterly basis in the following quarter. EX: your Q1 commissions (Jan to March) will be paid in May. Bear that in mind. HR is a joke with no insight into what people do, no exit interview for terminated contracts, and an apparent disregard for churn. They seem to live under the delusion that there are hundreds of candidates queuing at the door.

2.0
Feb 12, 2018

Great people on the ground - incompetent exec leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people you get to work with are in general very friendly, welcoming and generous of their time. There is a base of very talented people. Excellent relationships with clients and some agencies. Nicely located offices around the world. Never in the dodgy outskirts, always in the centre near the media agencies and other tech companies. A good technology base to build from.

Cons

1/ Terrible exec leadership. CEO is struggling with the job, focusing on details and flying relentlessly for quick local fixes instead of looking at the big picture. The CEO hasn't built a vision of the company and has failed to define what Quantcast should stand for, leaving space for infighting within his team and flavor-of-the-moment company statements. Impossible to rally behind. Every major decision (hires, restructures, investments) has been bad. SVP of engineering: promotes a very negative culture and no partnership with the Product team. A massive issue for a tech company. Suffocates innovation from junior team members and more senior alike if it doesn't go with what he is thinking. SVP of Product: very bright but not a product org leader. The quality of the product team and the lack of products (not features) is a testament of that. Needs to build products for the market and abandon the things that none wants. CMO: chief of buzzwords and no action. A lot of talk, a lot of selfies, a change of colours and logos, shooting ambulances to build his brand, but what is the effect for Quantcast? Where are the positive business outcomes? 90% of his team has churned in less than 6 months. Staff giggles when he is talking at the all hands. 2/ Product not up to scratch Advertising: Falling behind the competition in terms of results for clients, budget share, consideration and features. Failed to take the mobile turn. Measurement: will struggle as Google Analytics ups its game and the DMPs become simpler. Will end up being a quick fix solution for small, spammy websites. Data: the cornerstone of Quantcast's position is that it sees users hundred's of times of month. But according to the internal analysts, this is a lie. And more stringent privacy laws around the world + tracking blocks will put an end to this. 3/ Vision Where is it? 4/ Spirit Most employees are looking around. None challenges the leadership or senior management. Employees internally are making fun of the leadership and the company positioning (the recent shift to AI was perceived as a farce and is the subject of endless memes)

2.0
Jun 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Some of the nicest colleagues you will ever work with - Office snacks - Decent benefits

Cons

- No 401K or retirement matching program, which is unusual for a company this size - Zero strategy. The same leaders dictate how this place has run for several years now. They constantly change the direction, make rash decisions that impact peoples lives, and face zero consequences. They only care about protecting themselves. - They hire junior sales people, give minimal training and are annoyed when they don't perform. If an entire team isn't doing well, maybe it's time to look at your training or leaders. A team is only as good as it's leader. - Telling an entire team to get their resumes ready is the opposite of motivating, people wont work hard when they are treated like this - Some employees get to be remote, while other on the same team have to be in the office. Favouritism. - Turn over is really high across the company - Culture lacks psychological safety - Compensation is not competitive to the market - No plans to go IPO

Viewing 397 - 399 of 535 Reviews

Glassdoor has 579 Quantcast reviews submitted anonymously by Quantcast employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Quantcast is right for you.