Remote reviews

3.4

59% would recommend to a friend

(612 total reviews)
avatar

Job van der Voort

66% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Remote has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 612 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Remote employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

612 reviews
2.0
Apr 1, 2022

+1 to 'Great mission, poor leadership' - so true!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- One of the most noble missions in tech right now, and ICs really are the only ones at the company living the company values (with rare exceptions). - Some teams seem unaffected by how downhill scaling up generally went for most teams at Remote - Extremely supportive colleagues - Flexible working hours - Generally okay salary if you're based outside of the US/Western Europe

Cons

- Async = desync + dysfunctional most of the time - 'Flexible PTO' - you can hear sentences referencing studies done that prove 'people take less PTO if PTO = infinite' from leadership; loop holes behind taking PTO rendering almost impossible to go on PTO unless you really need it and want to put your colleagues at risk of being even more overworked - Leadership is mostly comprised of people without the proper experience in leading teams of such a size + most of them aren't a good fit for the vertical they're leading (some came from completely irrelevant backgrounds with no subject matter expertise) - Leadership is imposing a passive culture onto the company (assertiveness isn't welcomed and leads to people that work hard suffer the most due to no action being taken for others that completely abuse the flexibility they're offered) - I completely agree that some people from the leadership teams should PR check their statements before making them public (a lot of 'jokingly said' stuff that could basically be considered mobbing if the 'joke' part would be taken out + no one's laughing, they're intimidated so good job, I guess) - Awful prioritization of things in general - leadership is pushing for completely irrelevant things that no one asked for. Neither users nor employees internally; 'transparency' non existent - as it was said, it's more of a 'we tell you the bad news 2 hours before they're commenced to happen' - SO many operational problems and dysfunctionalities between the teams, that are painfully obvious even to more junior hires at the company - Extreme disbalance between some salaries, even for people in the same team - Candid feedback isn't welcome, full stop - may have been better a year ago, not today. Mostly the reason behind 'anonymous' feedbacks being prioritized as of late (the People team seems to have realized how people actually feel about transparency and feedback) - Completely subjective promotion structure; no meritocracy and straight up bad choices being made in this context (and often)

avatar
Remote Response
4y
Hi there, Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. We truly believe feedback can bring a lot of value to the work we do day to day and drive meaningful change, especially when it's constructive and clear. We’re truly pleased to learn that you find the team around you supportive and aligned with our values. We’re are building our hiring process and all our people-related processes around our values, we are using them daily in all the things we do and we are therefore really glad to hear it's showing in the team. With regards to the cons and advice to the management you have shared, we acknowledge your thoughts and we have read them thoroughly and we will always remain thankful for all constructive feedback and feedback in line with Remote’s Values. Remote is still in our early years, some things will change quickly and at short notice - that's just the nature of being a fast-growing company - and we have built resources on how to approach change, available to all team members. Some things might not change as quickly, depending on the company goals and core needs of our employees and our customers. Considering you are a current employee, we would love the opportunity to work with you and want to highlight that we are always willing to listen, therefore please reach out to our People Parter team or utilise AllVoices for anonymous feedback. We always want to grow and improve and will continue to lean into creating an incredible environment for everyone and do better.
1.0
Jan 26, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Being able to live and work where you want

Cons

1. Really incompetent leadership - they have no idea what they're doing. Its amazing how many of the leaders are completely out of their depth and can repeatedly make everything worse each quarter. 2. Terrible work life balance - especially in all the customer facing roles. Dealing with all the customer complaints and terrible internal processes is why people are burning out at a spectacular rate, with no end in sight. 3. Awful compensation. Remote will milk you for all your worth. They don't care about any of their employees. They will do everything they can to make a few extra dollars off the back of the hard working people keeping the company afloat. A terrible strategy which has led to a decent short term gain with great margins, but awful for the long term which is why they are all scratching their heads and wondering whats going wrong.

avatar
Remote Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback. We're sorry to hear that you're not having a great experience. We acknowledge your concerns about leadership and work-life balance. We are always working on our leadership training programs and we are in the process of reviewing our internal processes to ensure that our team members have a balanced work-life environment. Regarding compensation, we regularly benchmark our remuneration packages against industry standards and aim to provide competitive compensation to all our employees. Please feel free to raise your concerns with HR or your manager. We value your input and are committed to improving the Remote experience for all our employees.
1.0
Jul 3, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This review is based solely on my experience and is written with utmost careful thought. For context: I hit 90+% of my Y1 target and 60+% of my Q1 of this year. I got fired randomly in the middle of the Q2. One of the main reasons for joining Remote is so I can be reuinted with my family in a country of my choice. Remote gave me the ability to move close to my family and partner, giving me not only access to financial scalability but also enhancements in my mental in relation to my personal situation. This makes Remote a great 'buy-in' for the remote work believers, who do not have to either sacrifice location, wealth and/or family. For that I am forever grateful and appreciate what C-level is doing to maintain this culture and trend. The reality is, however, completely different. Mid-management and lower have no understanding of Remote's culture - read cons for elaborate review of Remote.

Cons

I joined Remote in April 2022 with high levels of motivation, love, and admiration for the company. The opportunity to move back home to my family without making significant sacrifices was greatly appreciated. Initially, my experience with Remote was positive, with good performance reviews, excellent sales feedback, and satisfied clients. Unfortunately, I found myself being unexpectedly laid off on the in June. To this day, clients reach out to me on my personal WhatsApp to seek assistance related to Remote, expressing their dissatisfaction with the current experience. This further reinforced my concerns about the company's decisions. In January, Remote implemented a split for hybrid AEs, creating hunters and farmers teams for new business (NB) and existing business (EB) respectively. However, the execution was poorly handled. The implementation in late December and early January caused delays in account assignments and led to unethical practices, with hunters closing EB deals that should have been handled by farmers. Shockingly, 36% of my team's revenue came from EB, despite our targets being based on NB. C-level management recognized the challenges faced by AEs in Q1 and acknowledged that the implementation could have been better. In several all-hands meetings during Q2, our CRO apologized for the lack of coordination that hindered our success. While a few individuals excelled, many of us, including myself, faced difficulties because we adhered to the rules and did not close any EB deals. The real turning point came when my manager joined in April. From the outset, our relationship was marked by conflicts. She exhibited manipulative, conniving, and two-faced behavior. In our very first meeting, she hinted at and threatened my job security due to my Q1 performance, which did not match the previous year's outstanding results. It was disheartening to start a managerial role on such a negative note. This manager displayed a complete disregard for asynchronous work, imposing strict oversight on individuals experiencing a challenging quarter. She required detailed 40-hour work matrices to scrutinize our activities and offered trivial advice on time efficiency. She regularly checked everyone's calendars, provided unnecessary checklists for daily tasks, even when deadlines were weeks away; in sum: treated AEs as if they were children. Strangely enough, the CEO himself, in a Dutch podcast, explicitly expressed his disapproval of such management practices, calling them "very strange." Furthermore, she publicly shamed lower-performing team members during meetings, highlighting their poor metrics and comparing them to top performers, despite the fact that the latter relied heavily on Existing Business for their revenue. Unfortunately, I fell into the low performer category when she joined in April, and her strong dislike for me, bordering on personal, became evident. Her manipulative tactics reached an extreme when she tricked me into a 1:1 meeting with her and HR by pretending to be too busy to attend our weekly sessions. She requested that I prepare a document to present to her in the next meeting, only to use it as a pretext for terminating my employment within three minutes in the middle of the quarter. Considering I was fired just six weeks after her appointment, with no prior warning, it strongly suggests that this decision was personal. While C-level appears preoccupied with diversity initiatives (of which I am a part), HR conducted an ad-hoc exit interview at the time of my termination. I mentioned feeling somewhat alienated at times due to the team predominantly consisting of individuals from a specific nationality. Curiously, as soon as I mentioned this, HR abruptly stopped taking notes and decided to conclud the call. It turns out, she shared the same nationality, which raised questions about objectivity. Truly is a shame how I geniunely loved this company and what it stood for, did my best to present myself perfectly, just to encounter 1 person to spoil it all. Ironically, if Remote lives by their values - I would recommend it in a heartbeat.

avatar
Remote Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to leave such a detailed review. Any decision to restructure or refocus a team is not one we take lightly and we do so to ensure long-term health and sustainability of the business and the team. It’s unfortunate to hear that you had these interactions with your former manager before your departure that were so inconsistent with our values. We take allegations like these seriously, so if you are comfortable, please reach out to our People team so we can learn more about the situation. Current Remoters can share concerns such as these with their skip level leader or the People team, and if they are uncomfortable to do so directly, they can then use our anonymous feedback feature. Last summer we initiated a massive project to transform our go-to-market organization, and one of the biggest focus areas has been coordination within our growing global sales team. We’ve made a lot of progress over the last 12 months but we still have a long way to go, and we will keep pushing ourselves in this area. Thank you for being part of our journey and we wish you all the best in your career.
Viewing 160 - 162 of 612 Reviews

Glassdoor has 795 Remote reviews submitted anonymously by Remote employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Remote is right for you.