employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Rhythm Engineering

Is this your company?

Rhythm Engineering reviews

2.8

40% would recommend to a friend

(112 total reviews)
avatar

Reggie Chandra

41% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Rhythm Engineering has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 112 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Rhythm Engineering employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

112 reviews
5.0
Oct 14, 2014

Innovative company. Glad to be part of this movement!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

We reduce accidents by 30%. I get to be a part of this movement that makes a difference to the community around us. Very innovative leadership. Everyone is a contributor. Ideas are vetted and implemented. Very glad to be part of this exponentially-growing community.

Cons

Because of the exponential growth, we are constantly looking for talent. I think it is tough to find the right kind of talent in Kansas City. I feel that sometimes, we compromise on quality to satisfy the immediate need. I wish we were located in the Silicon Valley.

1.0
Apr 13, 2017

An Honest Review - Again from 2015

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Note that this review was on Glassdoor for a year before being removed for no reason. This is simply a re-post of that same review (slightly edited to remove direct reference to anyone other than the owner/CEO) as it is still pertinent. - The projects are interesting, but poorly vetted for feasibility. - Great work/life balance, although change is in the wind. - For the most part, great people. A few I didn't care for, but nothing time wouldn't inevitably correct. - As someone mentioned to me, this is the both best and worst place they've worked.

Cons

- Lack of an SME. This is a traffic company without a single subject matter expert on staff. What does that tell you? - Impressive turnover. In just 3 years, over 40 people have left this company of about 50. This isn't counting those who left during the previous 2 years of the company's existence. Every personal secretary to the owner has quit or been fired. One who had been with the company since the start was yelled at by RC so badly, she left in tears. The entire marketing department has been sacked 3 times, with round 4 coming very soon. R&D has seen the largest turnover rate, with 2 not even lasting a month. In-house legal counsel was fired. Members of upper management were forced out. The list goes on and on. This place is a lawsuit waiting to happen. - Ever changing project scope and timelines. Those that try to do their jobs using standard engineering practices are simply considered to be slackers and not producing quickly enough - after all, no hardware or software project should take more than 6 months to complete, right? - Part-time IT department. Who needs infrastructure! Simply hire a 30 hour a month incompetent rent-an-IT company to maintain a pair of vastly overloaded servers and hope for the best. Cheap. - Part-time HR department. The company contracts with an outside HR service for 30 hours a month of HR services. The HR service owner is far too intimately involved in Rhythm to have an unbiased employee-centric view. - Bonus-structured hiring. This seems to be something new from RC. Several recent hires have been on a bonus structure. Start off with a low base salary, and then dangle the carrot with promises of bonuses if impossible goals are met within impossible timelines. This is a win-win for RC - he can simply get rid of the employee if it looks like they may actually reach the goals and then keep their resulting work (yay, at-will employment), or get a very good, low cost employee if they can't quite reach the goal, but are close. Either way, bonuses are avoided. - Hire a Napoléon wanna be. The new management has the right ideas but the wrong approach. The employees aren't quite the bunch of slackers RC says they are. Most of the employees really do want standard processes in place, but threatening them with 12 hour days, 6 days a week and probable firings if unreasonable timelines aren't met isn't the way to do it. While your goal of canning the upper management is moving as planned, don't forget - RC will can you too as soon as your job is done. RC runs the company, and will always run the company - as I'm sure you are well aware; try buying another MacBook Pro if you forgot that fact. But, hey, maybe you can tank this company too before you get fired. - Ego. This company is all about RC's ego. Management spends the bulk of its time managing up to RC instead of managing down to ensure well designed, well tested, quality products that meet current (and future) traffic industry needs. This is a company that could be very good if RC didn't put his faith in the wrong people that feed him the crap he wants to hear instead of letting people with vast experience and ability do what they are very good at. - Pay disparity. New hires with significantly less experience, and zero traffic knowledge brought on at 30% - 60% higher wages than existing staff, with no intent to equalize that ridiculous difference. - Keep looking over your shoulder. Not a day went by that I didn't figure it would be my last. There is no comfort here that your job is secure. The turnover rate has been extremely high, and much of it is based on the whim of the owner. If he doesn't like you, he will make your employment truly miserable until you finally leave. - Profit sharing. Each year, 15% of profit (historically accrual based) is shared with the employees. Until 2014, this was never an issue - profit levels were small and the bonus was always about the same, with variance from employee to employee based on who the owner liked at the time. But 2014 was a banner year, with employees looking forward to a major (epic) bonus. However, the structure was suddenly changed to a cash basis, with year-end emphasis on cash reduction to lessen tax burden, and a last minute removal of significant cash brought the profit sharing bonus back to the level of previous years to avoid giving back to the employees what they were promised at time of hire. Enjoy your telepresence robot, RC. I hope it keeps you warm at night. A tacky, classless, greedy move. - Shilling. A couple of the 4 and 5 star reviews on Glassdoor are honest assessments, and I agree with them entirely, but the rest are simply shills. If you are seriously considering working here, please take the 4 and 5 star reviews with a huge grain of salt. The bulk of the low ratings are very true, but a few are utter trash. The 75% CEO rating is horribly inflated - 15% is far more accurate based on the grumblings within the company.

1.0
Feb 28, 2016

What is with the EEOC claims?

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Can you imagine having a company where nearly everyone who works for you not liking you and talking bad about you and EVERYONE who left your company can't say anything good about you? That's quite a legacy to leave.

Cons

What causes people to file EEOC claims? You have to do some pretty bad things. This claims art stacking up.

Viewing 31 - 33 of 112 Reviews

Glassdoor has 115 Rhythm Engineering reviews submitted anonymously by Rhythm Engineering employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Rhythm Engineering is right for you.