Riverside Research reviews

Bring back the old retirement benefits where the company use to pay match aa additional percentage of the employees match based on how well the company is doing. Every year is a record-breaking revenue generating year, some of that should go back to the employees like it used to. We always hear about request and suggestions on how to retain and keep top talent, bring back the perks and benefits that encouraged individuals to not leave. The problem really is not that hard to solve. should provide better retirement opportunities, maybe shorten the time needed to be with the company for more percentage contribution from the company. example 1-5 years 5% contribution, 5 -10 years 7% contribution, 10 years plus 10% contribution. more companies are offering better retirement plans. Radiance offers up to 15 percent a year right away, NASK offers up to 25% (this is not a typo). reality is individuals staying at a contracting company more than a few years is rare and since I have been with the company there have been a lot of individuals that left with five to ten years' experience, showing there was not enough perks to keep them longer most likely because higher pay and better retirement perks.