employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Signature Science

Is this your company?

Signature Science reviews

3.4

57% would recommend to a friend

(38 total reviews)

Adam L. Hamilton

57% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

Signature Science has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 38 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Signature Science employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

38 reviews
4.0
Aug 9, 2018

Great team

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and caring co-workers

Cons

Work is usually government contract based - cyclical and unpredicatable

1.0
Feb 24, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The chemistry group has an orbitrap! Pretty cool instrument. Every now and then, someone at the company *might* have a cool idea for a project, but pickings were slim when I was there. The biology group seems to have a lot going on for it right now, some very cool ideas and good people in that group.

Cons

Summary: Poor management, poor communication, rampant nepotism and shady office politics foster unethical behaviors and a toxic environment where brown-nosers are regularly rewarded at the expense of others, resulting in observable morale and productivity loss, leading to a failure to attract and retain strong employees or client contracts. No vision. Everything is a scramble/dash for the finish line. Poor management styles. Credit for ideas is rarely given, leading to no one stepping forward on projects to create the best product. I worked in the chemistry group for approx 1 year, based at HQ in Austin (also worked at Egg Harbor, NJ and Charlottesville, VA sites). I was hired away from another company for a specific position that required a security clearance. When my application for clearance was rejected due to a company error and had to be resubmitted, the position for which I’d been hired was filled by a separate hire, with management never informing me of this or what my new role would be. I was left in the dark for months, working on random things here and there, and not furthering my management or laboratory skill set. As part of management’s cost savings strategy, experienced chemists with institutional knowledge were replaced with new, cheaper chemists straight out of undergrad. The average age in the group was very young and the experience level was low. Management regularly failed to recognize proper skill sets in employees that were pertinent for projects, throwing untrained/unskilled people from other groups at projects, just to bleed the government contracts dry. Communication from upper management was extremely poor, save for quarterly financial updates with the the company president. Real problems were sequestered by group managers, leading to frustration and low morale. The result was low productivity and rampant gossip, with brown-nosers/back-stabbers being the ones to get noticed and promoted. I regularly witnessed these team members taking credit for others’ work and ideas. The lack of ethics and safety practices I witnessed were concerning. Ultimately, these factors have added up for the chemistry group, resulting in several lost contracts and high level employees leaving toxic working conditions.

1.0
Jun 3, 2017

Drunks

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good location and Austin is a nice city

Cons

Several employees spend the afternoon doing shots in the bathroom so the can tolerate meetings. Drinking at lunch and on the job is a way of life. Beer and bong parties are common. Totally tired of working in this environment where backstabbing is done daily

Viewing 28 - 30 of 38 Reviews

Glassdoor has 42 Signature Science reviews submitted anonymously by Signature Science employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Signature Science is right for you.