employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Southern California Edison

Engaged Employer

Southern California Edison reviews

3.9

79% would recommend to a friend

(1,761 total reviews)
avatar

Steven Powell

79% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Southern California Edison has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,761 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Southern California Edison employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Energy, Mining & Utilities industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
5.0
Sep 22, 2024

TSO

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and opportunities for overtime

Cons

Union job where it felt like an us versus them (the company)

2.0
Sep 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly and supportive engineering coworkers, great amenities, and a solid 401k match (if you stay for the 5-year vesting period). The Kaiser PPO health insurance is a plus, and the company offers a strong internship program.

Cons

Management expects engineers to be available 24/7 with a work phone, leading to unpaid overtime (45+ hour work weeks are normal). Even when you're already overwhelmed, more tasks keep piling on. External hires often receive higher pay—I've seen engineers brought in at the same level earning more, and one even left for a $30k+ raise at LADWP. The CEO pushed for a return to the office, which contradicts the company's supposed commitment to safety and clean energy. The workplace isn't unionized, so there are no cost-of-living adjustments. There's no formal training program for engineers, resulting in many projects being improperly completed. Additionally, the company is planning significant layoffs by the end of 2024 or early 2025.

1.0
Sep 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The 401k plan is decent, and employees receive a discount on electricity. The company has a diverse workforce, with many managers who don’t have a bachelor's degree, and a significant number of women in mid-management positions.

Cons

There's an excessive number of mid-level managers. To be truly competitive, they need to flatten the structure, similar to Amazon. Leadership at the C-level and VP level is incompetent. Steve Powell (a 'Tom Wambsgans' from Succession) even told employees outright that their jobs aren’t stable, and that layoffs will continue to 'improve efficiency' in coming years, But layoffs in the name of efficiency are just a dog and pony show to boost stock prices. They let go of individual contributors while keeping layers of mid-level paper pushers. This cycle of layoffs happens every few years, only to be followed by rehiring soon after. In short: layoffs every few years, no job stability, promotions based on likability, and insecure managers trying way too hard to seem 'cool' and 'fun.' Instead of being authentic, they mask their nerdy selves to fit in with upper leadership—who are just like them: nerds trying to seem 'cool',

Viewing 124 - 126 of 1,761 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,131 Southern California Edison reviews submitted anonymously by Southern California Edison employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Southern California Edison is right for you.