employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Southern California Edison

Engaged Employer

Southern California Edison reviews

4.0

80% would recommend to a friend

(1,763 total reviews)
avatar

Steven Powell

81% approve of CEO

67% positive business outlook

Southern California Edison has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 1,763 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Southern California Edison employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Energy, Mining & Utilities industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Jun 16, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place if you want stability, offers great benefits and profit participation. Depending on management, can be a great place to work. Depending on your work group, opportunities for growth. Once you're hired by the company, you're practically guaranteed lifetime employment as company is reluctant to fire people with known workplace problems.

Cons

* 18 month residency rule--you must be in your current position for 18 months before you can apply for other jobs. Even if you get promoted, this resets your 18 month clock. I've seen management promote people just so they don't transfer out after their residency ends (tip: you can turn down promotions). * Uneven promotion criteria. I've seen people get promoted who don't even meet the criteria outlined by the Manager 3 of what it took for promotion (none of the promoted met the criteria). * Lack of qualified managers or management training. For example Cost Estimating is being run by an MBA grad a couple years out of business school who said he wanted to make employees happy, wanted to focus on career development, wanted a work environment based on respect and teamwork; but has made decisions and changes that proved quite the contrary. * Very bureaucratic company. Lack of teamwork. I agree with the reviewer if there was an open market, SCE would be very slow to make necessary changes. Right now, it's an overbloated company. Seems like more managers and employees are hired to fuel bureaucratic needs (i.e. managers hired to coordinate expectations and requests between two work groups). * Bad hiring decisions. I've seen managers with hardly any applicable experience and no people skills being hired. For example the managers running TDBU Cost Estimating have no actual cost estimating experience and haven't even gone through the process of estimating a project. They make major changes without even consulting existing employee. * Too many employees close to retirement who are just phoning it in. Seriously, this is a drag on morale as younger people are picking up the slack.

1.0
Mar 19, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many challenges due to transportation electrification

Cons

They reorganize every three years and perform layoffs at each iteration

1.0
May 13, 2024

Bad Company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A paycheck, benefits, a yearly “bonus”.

Cons

This is a bad company to work at. It’s highly bureaucratic and managers are often awful. Engineering is mostly contracted out, and you “review” the work…really rubber stamp it. Engineering decisions are made by a few…those few will let contractors make the decisions for them…and you will end up not practicing a whole lot of actual engineering at this company. Professional engineering licenses are not required or respected. Managers are often incompetent and put in charge of departments or teams in which they have little or no experience in the work the group does. They rotate department managers now and again. Blame game goes on here a lot. Also, indecision among management is common so they won’t have to take responsibility if they made the wrong decision. They then make you take responsibility to “drive to completion” the work because you cannot wait so long for them to make a decision. You make the decision for them and take all blame of it’s wrong. Management does this by destroying people’s performance review, and veterans are forced to move departments into new jobs. Do that or you better quit if a manager goes after you here. Very unfair, and they didn’t promote often or give good raises to engineers in my department. Pay is low for CA, especially the Los Angeles area high cost of living, and benefits were scaled back late 2017 from a pension to a 401k and less health benefits and less time off. This is from a company that makes hundreds of millions of dollars in pure profit every year, guaranteed by the CPUC. Yet, they chose shareholders over employees. Political DEI nonsense thrives here, too. Lots of people with thick accents work here and not a whole lot of people without an accent working here. So, suspicious hiring practices. Management often hiring friends or people from same ethnicity from foreign countries like they’re from. Avoid this company. It’s not worth it. Toxic.

Viewing 262 - 264 of 1,763 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,133 Southern California Edison reviews submitted anonymously by Southern California Edison employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Southern California Edison is right for you.