Tether.to reviews

2.3

27% would recommend to a friend

(8 total reviews)

27% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

8 reviews
2.0
Nov 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with remotely. Compensation is competitive.

Cons

Full of work politics and discrimination. So much fuss but very little production. The technical stack for backend services is severely outdated and poorly maintained. You literally will work using a stack that no one else uses or is actively moving away from. Once you leave, you will have to go through an aggressive upskilling plan to get back on track! Management is inexperienced and very unprofessional. Don't be surprised if you experience the following cultural issues: Team leads or senior members may ask you to delete unit/e2e tests simply because they expose problems in the existing code. An individual may ask you to work on a feature for months, only to take over and submit the work under their name in the final days. You are asked to perform technically incorrect tasks and requests for documentation are refused. You are often the only one attending stand-ups, with the rest of the team coordinating tasks via internal channels like Slack. Demos are shown to higher management with static content and hardcoded systems that are supposed to be dynamic. The team spends a whole year building a system without verifying its core functionality works. You get 21 annual leave days but are actively prevented from taking half of them. You work for weeks on a feature without being able to test or run your work because a stable test environment is not prioritized. There is no work-life balance at all. You will work very long hours without any appreciation, and requests for breaks or leave are routinely denied. Working 10-12 hours a day is normalized, representing a total lack of boundaries between work time and personal time in a remote environment.

1.0
Mar 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Flexible remote structure and exposure to AI-related workflows. - Flexible remote structure and exposure to AI-related workflows. - Some projects initially appear technically interesting, and the company presents itself as working on ambitious initiatives involving machine learning and data processing. - Some projects initially appear technically interesting, and the company presents itself as working on ambitious initiatives involving machine learning and data processing.

Cons

Management frequently communicates unclear or technically unrealistic project expectations, often providing incomplete or misleading information about scope and feasibility. Decision-making sometimes appears to rely on superficial AI-generated summaries rather than technical evaluation. Work is frequently passed between team members without ownership or accountability, making it difficult to maintain quality or professional integrity under the timelines provided. Payments can be highly irregular, with invoices delayed for extended periods and limited transparency regarding when compensation will be processed. Communication regarding payment issues tends to produce standardized responses without concrete timelines or resolution. Because compensation may be delayed unpredictably, financial planning becomes extremely difficult. Contracts are structured near the legal minimum hourly rates in some jurisdictions, and certain tools or resources necessary to perform work (including cloud computing or software licenses) may effectively require personal upfront payment. While reimbursement processes technically exist, they can be subjective and slow, creating situations where employees risk covering operational costs themselves. Workplace culture can feel competitive in an unhealthy way. Collaboration is limited, and communication between colleagues can sometimes involve vague guidance, public criticism, or shifting responsibility. Opportunities for advancement or long-term growth appear very limited. Management discusses ambitious technical goals, such as large-scale AI model training, but the available infrastructure, funding, and planning often seem insufficient to support those goals effectively.

1.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Remote work - Flexible hours

Cons

- Management is clueless - No time to learn or finish projects - Many projects you work on get cancelled fast, they care more about flashy titles and visuals than results - Reputational damage for your career by associating yourself with some of these projects. - Manager with no background in research or AI treating research like a standalone SW gig with "Story points" and tickets.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 8 Reviews

Glassdoor has 13 Tether.to reviews submitted anonymously by Tether.to employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Tether.to is right for you.