employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

The Washington Post reviews

3.0

33% would recommend to a friend

(644 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff D’Onofrio

Not enough data to show CEO approval

10% positive business outlook

The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 644 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

644 reviews
1.0
Oct 26, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of paid off-time: three weeks of vacation, three weeks of sick leave, one week of personal day + holiday.

Cons

The company has a multi-layer corporate America structure: from team lead to mangers to directors to VPs to CEO. Lots of internal politics, everyone just watch their own back to keep the job. The role itself is really a QA engineer, not ML engineer. For 85% of the time, you work on infrastructure migration, pipeline maintenance, and code improvement. You are constantly being hassled to meet the deadlines. For the 15% of ML, you are told what model to use, what code to write. Very boring!

4.0
Oct 4, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work hours are good

Cons

Lower than industry average pay

Viewing 217 - 219 of 644 Reviews

Glassdoor has 714 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.